1990
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511524493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twistor Geometry and Field Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
440
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
440
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has a geometrical interpretation in terms of holomorphic bundles over the twistor space P = R 4 × CP 1 for the space R 4 [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has a geometrical interpretation in terms of holomorphic bundles over the twistor space P = R 4 × CP 1 for the space R 4 [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the gauge potential A is inert under a transformation ψ ± → ψ h ± ± := ψ ± h −1 ± , where h ± live in the complexified gauge group and are regular holomorphic on U ± , respectively. This is known as the twistor correspondence or the Euclidean version of Ward's theorem [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the purely bosonic case, one can introduce real (antihermitean) gauge fields on R 4 with a metric g of Euclidean signature (4, 0), Kleinian signature 46 Another possibility to obtain equation (8.15) is to use an action of holomorphic BF-type theories [42]. However, the relation of this kind of action with SFT is also unclear.…”
Section: Reality Conditions On the Quadricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our considerations in this paper are based on the results of many authors (see e.g., and references therein). More details on twistor theory and the Penrose-Ward transform can be found in the books [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike [19,21] and standard texts on Penrose's twistor theory [23], see e.g. [24], we avoid considering compactified complexified Minkowski space and its super-extensions, for these concepts are not relevant from the point of view of superconformal model-building we are interested in. Our 4D consideration is directly based on the use of (conformally) compactified Minkowski space S 1 × S 3 and its super-extensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%