1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(96)00086-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twitch interpolation in the assessment of the maximum force-generating capacity of the jaw-closing muscles in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fracture is one of the greatest concerns when FPDs are fabricated from ceramic or resin material. The maximum bite force of adult males in the posterior region is said to be around 600 N 26,27) . In our experiment, control FPDs that were not reinforced with FRC had such low fracture loads(an average of 403 N) that they probably would not be able to withstand the maximum bite force in the posterior region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture is one of the greatest concerns when FPDs are fabricated from ceramic or resin material. The maximum bite force of adult males in the posterior region is said to be around 600 N 26,27) . In our experiment, control FPDs that were not reinforced with FRC had such low fracture loads(an average of 403 N) that they probably would not be able to withstand the maximum bite force in the posterior region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The load was then increased 25 - 50N, and the entire was process repeated. Within a simulated human occlusal force range from 0 N to 522 N [ 12 , 13 ], the casts were loaded at 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, and 450 N. The experimental design produced 100 photos for analysis. In all photographs, 6 consistent markings (indicating 6 contacts) were identified on both casts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of 240 N is within the researched range of average human occlusal force. 20,21 The T-Scan II occlusal analysis recording handle was mounted in the POFS handle nest in order to fix the recording handle in place so that each test sensor was aligned consistently in the same orientation, centered on the midline of the maxillary incisors of the casts ( Figure 2). The nest stabilized the recording handle while the test sensor underwent repeated closures of the epoxy casts to minimize sensor-positioning variability.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%