2015
DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2015.1062641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twitter and the celebrity interview

Abstract: This article argues that moments of interaction between celebrities and audiences on Twitter are influenced by modes of intercommunication established in the traditional press interview. Through statistical analysis of the last 3200 tweets of the top 20 celebrity Twitter accounts in terms of followers as of June 2014, the article examines sustainability of celebrity performance on the site and levels of interaction. It shows how using constructs of the celebrity interview enables celebrities to articulate what… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we define celebrity as a daily performance, we do it from the perspective of symbolic interactionism, which considers everyday social interactions as (semi-)conscious performances (Goffman, 1959). Rather than cynically condemning the guru's participation on YouTube as purely instrumental and economically motivated or pejoratively labelling her fans' comments about their felt benefits from her content as "normative" or "romanticized", we see social media audiences as active seekers of entertainment and knowledge and conscious of the processes at play (Usher, 2015;Hills, 2002Hills, , 2006. Furthermore, we understand online creators like Bubz as social beings who are themselves personally influenced by the feedback and support they receive (e.g.…”
Section: Edit Yourself To Be "Safe-for-business"!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we define celebrity as a daily performance, we do it from the perspective of symbolic interactionism, which considers everyday social interactions as (semi-)conscious performances (Goffman, 1959). Rather than cynically condemning the guru's participation on YouTube as purely instrumental and economically motivated or pejoratively labelling her fans' comments about their felt benefits from her content as "normative" or "romanticized", we see social media audiences as active seekers of entertainment and knowledge and conscious of the processes at play (Usher, 2015;Hills, 2002Hills, , 2006. Furthermore, we understand online creators like Bubz as social beings who are themselves personally influenced by the feedback and support they receive (e.g.…”
Section: Edit Yourself To Be "Safe-for-business"!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering literature that looked at core practices at the intersections of celebrity and digital culture for both mainstream and 'native' online celebrities (Ellcessor, 2012;Kanai, 2015;Marshall, 2010;Marwick 2013Marwick , 2015aMarwick , 2015bboyd 2010, 2011;Meyers, 2009;Usher, 2015;Smith, 2014), I aim to extend this scholarly dialogue to explore the celebrity subject position of 'beauty guru' on YouTube's beauty community, based on the successful channel Bubzbeauty. I map out the most relevant and pervasive qualities of the channel's tutorials and vlogs to examine the building of popularity and the sustaining of the owner's role as an influential beauty guru through the years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further understanding the building of online popularity on YouTube not only contributes to conceptualising the specific ideology of fame on the platform, but can also inform us about the inherent social significance of new types of celebrities who, even as 'just online celebrities', unknown to the public at large, appear to embody the same societal and cultural roles as mainstream celebrities. As a text, a site, and a sign of both symbolic and practical (everyday-life) values, they provide (and viewers actively make use of) the same paradigmatic opportunities once reserved only for the consumption of and interaction with mass-media celebrities: to discuss, learn, emulate, admire and criticise (Kanai, 2015;Redmond, 2014;Usher, 2015). Additionally, in the words of Marshall, they promote the chance of 'talk[ing] about sometimes very intimate and personal topics, but in a very public way ' (2006: 639).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this article, I seek to contribute to ongoing scholarly dialogue in the areas of digital culture and online celebrity (Kanai, 2015;Marwick 2015aMarwick , 2015bSmith, 2014;Usher 2015). I discuss the relevance of authenticity as an essential, much sought-after construct that legitimizes the privileged position of beauty gurus and further enables the ongoing strengthening of their online status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%