2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-013-9227-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twitter n-gram corpus with demographic metadata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same process is applied for female users. The accuracy of this process was 97.85%, with approximately symmetric error rates for either gender: 2.94% of the females and 2.35% of the males (Herdağdelen, 2013).…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same process is applied for female users. The accuracy of this process was 97.85%, with approximately symmetric error rates for either gender: 2.94% of the females and 2.35% of the males (Herdağdelen, 2013).…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In order to increase the size of our database we included the names that appeared in the American population census of 1960-2010 (Herdağdelen, 2013) and the most popular names in America in 1990 (Herdağdelen, 2013). Our database has 19,562 unique names (9019 female names, 10,563 male names).…”
Section: Name Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, with aim to filter uncommon or low quality variants, the Rovereto Twitter corpus (Herdagdelen, 2013) was initially used in order to rank the English candidates present in the corpus by their frequencies. The 38% of the variants generated by one transformation were successfully found, however, performing direct Twitter search API queries resulted to have better coverage than using a static corpus (90% for English variants).…”
Section: Candidate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research done by (Herdağdelen, 2013) was concentrated on a potential combining of an n-gram text corpus from twitter messages with demographics metadata. He used these messages coupled with metadata about their authors to understand a wide variety of phenomena ranging from political polarization to geographic and demographic lexical variation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%