2014
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2014.892149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twitter publics: how online political communities signaled electoral outcomes in the 2010 US house election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of them have turned to one or multi-step snowball sampling approaches (for example, Bastos et al, 2013), while others have opted for random sampling or systematic sampling approaches (Kiousis et al, 2014;McKelvey et al, 2014;Theocharis et al, 2015). In the case of this study, the previous defined three-step approach was selected to capture potential interactions between two or more #ggi tweeters as well as possible patterns of retweeted #ggi content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them have turned to one or multi-step snowball sampling approaches (for example, Bastos et al, 2013), while others have opted for random sampling or systematic sampling approaches (Kiousis et al, 2014;McKelvey et al, 2014;Theocharis et al, 2015). In the case of this study, the previous defined three-step approach was selected to capture potential interactions between two or more #ggi tweeters as well as possible patterns of retweeted #ggi content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumasjan et al (2010) find that the number of tweets from the general public mentioning a political party or politician is a valid indicator of political sentiment and a good predictor of federal election results in Germany. More recently, similar results have been found for federal elections in Australia and the U.S. House of Representatives [Unankard et al (2014), McKelvey, DiGrazia and Rojas (2014)]. In contrast to these previous works, we rely only on the link relations, so-called "meta-data," among politicians to measure influence and identify conversation flows with network analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…On the other hand, large-scale datasets offer a unique opportunity to examine social phenomena at a scale that previously was not possible. Twitter data have been used to understand and predict voting trends in political elections (McKelvey, DiGrazia, & Rojas, 2014), and to predict key topics of discussion in politics (Rill, Reinel, Scheidt, & Zicari, 2014). In these examples, the scale was necessary to enhance the predictive power and validity of the data.…”
Section: Questions Of Size and Timementioning
confidence: 99%