2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0763(200009)7:3<189::aid-arp134>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two- and three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar surveys across a medieval choir: a case study in archaeology

Abstract: Excavations around the Prediger Church in Zurich (Switzerland) for a building project prompted interest in the region beneath the choir, which dates from the thirteenth century. To supplement archaeological information on the church, the hidden remains beneath the choir were investigated with ground-penetrating radar (GPR). An initial coarse GPR survey with shielded highfrequency antennae mapped the locations and dimensions of buried walls beneath the choir. The choir was determined to be rectangular and an al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous commonly employed geophysical techniques for archaeological prospection in ancient, complex, urban sites, which describes the site core area of Pacbitun, including electric resistivity tomography or imaging (ERT/ERI) [10][11][12][13], geomagnetic mapping (GM), frequency domain electromagnetic methods (FDEM) [14][15][16][17][18][19], and GPR or georadar [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. A GPR and GM survey was deemed most appropriate for exploring two plaza areas which needed to be completed in six days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous commonly employed geophysical techniques for archaeological prospection in ancient, complex, urban sites, which describes the site core area of Pacbitun, including electric resistivity tomography or imaging (ERT/ERI) [10][11][12][13], geomagnetic mapping (GM), frequency domain electromagnetic methods (FDEM) [14][15][16][17][18][19], and GPR or georadar [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. A GPR and GM survey was deemed most appropriate for exploring two plaza areas which needed to be completed in six days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antennas used were almost invariably at the low‐frequency end of the spectrum thus favouring depth penetration at the potential expense of target definition and there was a higher usage of 2D data sets than of time slices extracted from 3D data. One notable exception was the detailed work carried out by Leckebusch (2000) in detecting the buried remains of a 13 th century church using complementary orthogonal surveys and 3D data. More recently there has been a growing interest in improved definition of the image of buried substructures and the detection of smaller features resulting in the creation of denser data sets as well as greater use of horizontal time slices as an effective mapping tool (e.g., Piro et al 2003; Linford 2004; Utsi 2006; Novo et al 2010; Udphuay et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good overview was given by Owen (1995). This technique has a limited depth of penetration and involves relatively complicated processing and interpretation methods, but is very appealing for mapping buried archaeological structures (Goodman et al, 1995;Pipan et al, 1999;Leckebusch, 2000;Piro et al, 2001;Seren et al, 2006) because of its 3-D imaging capability. Various authors have described recent attempts to increase field productivity (Lehmann and Green, 1999), including the use of multi-channel devices (Birken et al, 2002(Birken et al, , 2005Leckebusch, 2005b;Gustafsson and Alkarp, 2007) and high accuracy positioning systems (Young and Lord, 2002;Leckebusch, 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%