Two- and Three-Factor Solutions of the WAIS-Ill

Abstract

The third edition of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale manual reports four-factor solutions for the WAIS-III, and subsequent research has validated four-factor solutions for a variety of samples. These four factors consistently correspond to the four Factor Indexes that are yielded by the WAIS-III. However, the WAIS-III still provides Verbal and Performance IQs, in addition to the Indexes, making it desirable to examine two-factor solutions as well. In addition, because the Wechsler literature includes much interpretation of three-factor solutions, these solutions were likewise examined. Principal factor analysis followed by Varimax and Oblimin rotations of two and three factors were performed on data for the total WAIS-III sample ages 16 to 89 years (N=2,450). The two-factor solutions were viewed as a construct validation of Wechsler's two separate IQs, although the Working Memory subtests tended to load higher on the Performance scale than on their intended scale (Verbal); three-factor solutions were interpreted within the context of Horn's expanded fluid-crystallized theory and research on working memory. Both the two- and three-factor Varimax-rotated solutions were related to similar factor analyses conducted previously for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III. Coefficients of congruence between like-named factors consistently exceeded .90, and usually .98, across different Wechsler batteries.

BDNF Variants May Modulate Long-Term Visual Memory Performance in a Healthy Cohort

“…The intelligence quotient (IQ) was measured using subsets of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) IQ test, created in 1955 by David Wechsler, which is a well-established IQ test for measuring adult intelligence [49]. The vocabulary and matrix reasoning subsets of WASI were completed in this study to estimate the IQ of participants.…”

Cognitive Functioning and Acute Sedative Effects of Risperidone and Quetiapine in Patients With Stable Bipolar I Disorder

“…The primary endpoint was derived from 8 computerized neurocognitive tests chosen for the specific aspects of cognitive performance that are measured by each test. The tests included: (1) AX Continuous Performance Test 18,19 ; (2) Identical Pairs Continuous Performance Test, 4-digit version 20-22 ; (3) Flanker Continuous Performance Test 23 ; (4) Auditory Digit Span [24][25][26][27] ; (5) Auditory Number Sequencing 28 ; (6) Strategic Target Detection 29,30 ; (7) Word List Memory 31,32 ; and (8) Symbol Digit Substitution. 33,34 Each test generates a series of dependent variables (e.g., reaction time, ability to distinguish targets from nontargets, total experiment time, and number of correct responses).…”

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV

“…For the editions of these tests published in the past two decades, there is strong evidence that a four-factor model—Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, and Processing Speed— best describes the latent structure of the intelligence scales (Bowden, Lissner, McCarthy, Weiss, & Holdnack, 2007; Bowden, Weiss, Holdnack, Bardenhagen, & Cook, 2008; Dickinson, Iannone, & Gold, 2002; Donders, & Warschausky, 1996; Taub, McGrew, & Witta, 2004; Wechsler, 2003, 2008); although some studies disagree with such conclusion (Kaufmann, Lichtenberger, & McLean, 2001; Keith, Fine, Taub, Reynolds, & Kranzler, 2006). Although there is a substantial body of research evaluating the factor structure of the Wechsler intelligence scales, the study on the Wechsler memory scales has not been as extensive, and obtaining consistent factor structure across studies and test editions has been elusive (Wechsler, 2009).…”