“…The contrast of the antiproliferative activities of compounds 25−35 revealed that the antitumor activities of compounds 27 and 31 were more potent than those of the 4-methoxy (26), 5-ethoxy (29 and 33), 5difluoromethoxy (28 and 32), 5-isopropoxy (34), and 1,3dioxolane (30 and 35)-substituted analogues, suggesting that the 5-methoxy group on the indole ring was favorable for improving the antitumor activity. In addition, the replacement of the central scaffold of 11H-indolo [3,2-c]isoquinoline (35) by 6,11-dihydro-5H-indolo [3,2-c]isoquinolin-5-one (24) generates less-potent products, and the 1-chlorine substitution on the isoquinoline ring (27) decreases the antiproliferative activity of the compound (31). Among them, compound 31 represents the optimal agent, with IC 50 values of 0.53 μM against the HCT116 cancer cell line, and showed from 3.8-to In addition, the antitumor activities of the heterocyclicsubstituted indolo [3,2-c]isoquinoline derivatives were investigated (Table 3).…”