2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18991-3_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Approaches for Discriminant Partial Least Squares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models were developed using a procedure written in the MATLAB 7.1 R14 environment. PLSDA (Sjöström et al 1986, Sabatier et al 2003, Infantino et al 2015) is a PLS regression (SIMPLS algorithm -De Jong 1993) in which the response variable is categorical, expressing the class membership of the statistical units. The objective of PLSDA is to find a model, developed from a training set of observations of known class membership, that separates classes of objects on the basis of their Xvariables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models were developed using a procedure written in the MATLAB 7.1 R14 environment. PLSDA (Sjöström et al 1986, Sabatier et al 2003, Infantino et al 2015) is a PLS regression (SIMPLS algorithm -De Jong 1993) in which the response variable is categorical, expressing the class membership of the statistical units. The objective of PLSDA is to find a model, developed from a training set of observations of known class membership, that separates classes of objects on the basis of their Xvariables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLS (Sjöström 10 et al, 1986;Sabatier et al, 2003;Costa et al, 2011a) is a soft modelling method for constructing predictive models with many and highly co-linear factors.…”
Section: Multivariate Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLSDA; Sjöström et al, 1986;Sabatier et al, 2003) was used to construct a model explaining the co-variation between otolith shapes, as expressed by EFA coefficients for S and L size classes (x-block), and the different sample sites (y-block). y-block classes were represented by a set of dummy variables describing the different samples (for methodological details see Menesatti et al, 2008;Costa et al, 2008Costa et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Inter-stock Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%