2017
DOI: 10.1126/science.aan1139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two areas for familiar face recognition in the primate brain

Abstract: Familiarity alters face recognition: Familiar faces are recognized more accurately than unfamiliar ones, and under difficult viewing conditions when unfamiliar face recognition fails. The neural basis for this fundamental difference remains unknown. Using whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that personally familiar faces engage the macaque face-processing network more than unfamiliar faces. Familiar faces also recruited two hitherto unknown face areas at anatomically conserved locations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
74
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
12
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with human MEG data 21 , facial representations in macaques were also found to gradually build up and become more invariant to viewpoint at successive processing stages, measured both spatially and temporally 39,43 , again showing the usefulness of the macaque's face perception system as a model to study human face perception. With regard to familiarity, our findings are in line with a recent study in macaques reporting early quantitative differences and late qualitative differences in processing of familiar versus unfamiliar faces 44 . However, the paradigms and stimuli that have been used so far in humans and macaque studies are too different to provide a precise correspondence between species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consistent with human MEG data 21 , facial representations in macaques were also found to gradually build up and become more invariant to viewpoint at successive processing stages, measured both spatially and temporally 39,43 , again showing the usefulness of the macaque's face perception system as a model to study human face perception. With regard to familiarity, our findings are in line with a recent study in macaques reporting early quantitative differences and late qualitative differences in processing of familiar versus unfamiliar faces 44 . However, the paradigms and stimuli that have been used so far in humans and macaque studies are too different to provide a precise correspondence between species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are consistent with strong evidence that neurons in areas ML/MF and AM code faces in terms of a continuous "shape-appearance" space 42 55 and macaques 56 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our model suggests one such hypothesis, in the form of 2.5D or intrinsic image components, which capture facial appearance and shape in a view-based, image-centric frame, and correspond well to middle face patch representations in macaques. Our model also suggests how those pictorial 2.5D representations can lead downstream to a full 3D description of face shape and appearance, which would correspond to more anterior face regions that [as noted by Grossman et al (44)] have yet to be studied intracranially in humans and then further downstream to representations of familiar individuals' identities [e.g., medial temporal lobe (MTL) and perirhinal cortex], which have been characterized in both humans and macaques (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%