2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2001.00823.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two auto‐detection methods for eye movements during eyes closed

Abstract: Eye movements during closed eyes closely reflect changes of the arousal level during transition from wakefulness to sleep. Because they contain both rapid and slow eye movements (REM and SEM), it has been difficult to detect them automatically. Hiroshige recently developed the method of linear regression analysis for automatic detection of the two types of eye movements, and we have developed a template matching method for autodetection. The aim of the present study was to compare both auto-detection methods a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have specifically investigated SEM detection to identify sleep onset automatically (Atienza et al, 2004;Hiroshige, 1999;Magosso et al, 2006;Suzuki et al, 2001;Va¨rri et al, 1996;Virkkala et al, 2007). Va¨rri et al (1996) proposed a SEM detection method using non-linear filtering techniques and applied it to EOG data measured during evening activities before going to bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have specifically investigated SEM detection to identify sleep onset automatically (Atienza et al, 2004;Hiroshige, 1999;Magosso et al, 2006;Suzuki et al, 2001;Va¨rri et al, 1996;Virkkala et al, 2007). Va¨rri et al (1996) proposed a SEM detection method using non-linear filtering techniques and applied it to EOG data measured during evening activities before going to bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing interest in SEMs has led to development of various algorithms for automated SEMs detection in EOG, based on different techniques and with different aims. However, some of these algorithms do not identify single SEMs (Värri et al, 1995); (Virkkala et al, 2007); others identify single SEMs, but the validation procedure either exhibits moderate performance (48% sensitivity) (Värri et al, 1996), or is not examined in depth (consisting only in the autodetection/visual scoring ratio) (Hiroshige, 1999); (Suzuki et al, 2001), or is absent (Shin et al, 2011). Moreover, so far none of these studies has characterized SEMs in terms of their parameters (such as amplitude or duration) nor has investigated how SEMs parameters evolve across the sleep onset period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%