Two birds with one stone: experiences of combining clinical and research training in addiction medicine

Abstract

BackgroundDespite a large evidence-base upon which to base clinical practice, most health systems have not combined the training of healthcare providers in addiction medicine and research. As such, addiction care is often lacking, or not based on evidence or best practices. We undertook a qualitative study to assess the experiences of physicians who completed a clinician-scientist training programme in addiction medicine within a hospital setting.MethodsWe interviewed physicians from the St. Paul’s Hospital Goldcorp Addiction Medicine Fellowship and learners from the hospital’s academic Addiction Medicine Consult Team in Vancouver, Canada (N = 26). They included psychiatrists, internal medicine and family medicine physicians, faculty, mentors, medical students and residents. All received both addiction medicine and research training. Drawing on Kirkpatrick’s model of evaluating training programmes, we analysed the interviews thematically using qualitative data analysis software (Nvivo 10).ResultsWe identified five themes relating to learning experience that were influential: (i) attitude, (ii) knowledge, (iii) skill, (iv) behaviour and (v) patient outcome. The presence of a supportive learning environment, flexibility in time lines, highly structured rotations, and clear guidance regarding development of research products facilitated clinician-scientist training. Competing priorities, including clinical and family responsibilities, hindered training.ConclusionsCombined training in addiction medicine and research is feasible and acceptable for current doctors and physicians in training. However, there are important barriers to overcome and improved understanding of the experience of addiction physicians in the clinician-scientist track is required to improve curricula and research productivity.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing addiction medicine fellowships: a qualitative study with fellows, medical students, residents and preceptors

“…Ministry of Health. For further description of how the programme is delivered, please refer to previous publication [ 27 ].…”

The scope and needs related to training, research, and mentorship among early-career addiction medicine professionals: an online global survey followed by expert group discussions

“…Developing research capacity among ECAMPs from low and lower-middle-income countries by conducting workshops with the support of facilitators from high-income countries can be a solution for the problem. Other allied addiction medicine professionals can also be engaged in such training programmes to develop workforce and build more capacity (35, 38, 39). The main challenges encountered for conducting research by ECAMPs in the European survey (n=258) were lack of time as a large proportion of participants (87.2%) reported conducting research after regular working hours or partly during and after working hours.…”

Impact of Research Training on Newly Graduated Health Professionals’ Motivation to Undertake Research

“…Both the quantitative and qualitative phases of this study highlighted the influence of confidence and value on motivation to do research and undertake research training. [57][58][59][60] The study findings showed that participants who had prior research training were more confident than those who had not been previously exposed to training. Previous research training was viewed positively by respondents and significantly influenced their expectations about participating in research.…”