2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3853-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Birds with One Stone: The Quest for Addressing Both Business Goals and Social Needs with Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cultural and social context where social innovation occurs promotes or hinders social innovation, as novelty-centered cultural values promote capabilities that support innovation, while efficiency-focused cultural values do not have significant effects [52]. In addition, context influences strategic flexibility during social innovation for firms to balance conflicting demands of different stakeholders in steering sustainable outcomes that meet criteria for user acceptance [53,54]. Therefore, the effectiveness of openness in innovation is determined by surrounding conditions in regulations, markets and technology [55].…”
Section: Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural and social context where social innovation occurs promotes or hinders social innovation, as novelty-centered cultural values promote capabilities that support innovation, while efficiency-focused cultural values do not have significant effects [52]. In addition, context influences strategic flexibility during social innovation for firms to balance conflicting demands of different stakeholders in steering sustainable outcomes that meet criteria for user acceptance [53,54]. Therefore, the effectiveness of openness in innovation is determined by surrounding conditions in regulations, markets and technology [55].…”
Section: Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, firms that pursue social innovation to create social value (Herrera, ) can expect favourable relationships with stakeholders and trust within the firm (Park et al, ). Candi et al () find a positive relationship between social innovation and customer acceptance and Eccles and Serafeim () argue that social innovation has the potential to improve business sustainability, which can increase competitive advantage (Fiorina, ; Urbancova, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pol and Ville (2009) argue that social innovation is in conflict with economic perspectives while van der Have and Rubalcaba (2016) argue that social innovation affects corporate identity and strategies, and employee engagement and motivation, as well as private and public interests. Thus, firms that pursue social innovation to create social value (Herrera, 2015) can expect favourable relationships with stakeholders and trust within the firm (Park et al, 2014). Candi et al (2018 find a positive relationship between social innovation and customer acceptance and Eccles and Serafeim (2013) argue that social innovation has the potential to improve business sustainability, which can increase competitive advantage (Fiorina, 2004;Urbancova, 2013).…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rooted in but differing from the business domain, social innovation is defined as “innovative activities and services that are motivated by the goal of meeting a social need” ( Mulgan, 2006 ) and as a novel solution for the social problem that is sustainable ( Phills et al, 2008 ). According to Candi et al (2019) , the social dimension of innovation can be classified into three streams: not-for-profit, hybrid, and business ethics. In the proposed education framework, instructors are free to choose the position according to their enterprise development support, culture, and perspective on civil society.…”
Section: The Sustainability-oriented Creativity Innovation and Entrmentioning
confidence: 99%