2005
DOI: 10.2336/nishinihonhifu.67.584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Cases of Giant Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Cotran 2 and Lattes, 4 the diagnostic criteria for metastatic BCC are as follows: (i) the primary tumor is in the skin, not in the mucous membrane; (ii) metastasis occurs at a site distant from the primary lesion and local extensions or far‐flung implantations are excluded; and (iii) the primary and metastatic lesions must have the same histology without any squamous cell carcinoma components. Approximately 300 cases of metastatic BCC have been described 5–8 in the English literature, and 27 cases have been reported in Japanese literature 9–30 . To discover any characteristic features of metastatic BCC, we compared 27 Japanese cases of metastatic BCC with 137 cases of non‐metastatic BCC treated in our hospital between 2007 and 2009 (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Cotran 2 and Lattes, 4 the diagnostic criteria for metastatic BCC are as follows: (i) the primary tumor is in the skin, not in the mucous membrane; (ii) metastasis occurs at a site distant from the primary lesion and local extensions or far‐flung implantations are excluded; and (iii) the primary and metastatic lesions must have the same histology without any squamous cell carcinoma components. Approximately 300 cases of metastatic BCC have been described 5–8 in the English literature, and 27 cases have been reported in Japanese literature 9–30 . To discover any characteristic features of metastatic BCC, we compared 27 Japanese cases of metastatic BCC with 137 cases of non‐metastatic BCC treated in our hospital between 2007 and 2009 (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%