2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.87.052712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-channel Bose-Hubbard model of atoms at a Feshbach resonance

Abstract: Based on the analytic model of Feshbach resonances in harmonic traps described in Phys. Rev. A 83, 030701 (2011) a Bose-Hubbard model is introduced that provides an accurate description of two atoms in an optical lattice at a Feshbach resonance with only a small number of Bloch bands. The approach circumvents the problem that the eigenenergies in the presence of a delta-like coupling do not converge to the correct energies, if an uncorrelated basis is used. The predictions of the BoseHubbard model are compared… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where U > 0 is the magnitude of the on-site attraction. In cold atom systems, the interaction can derive from an attractive Feshbach resonance [63,66]. We study the effect of this attractive interaction at the mean-field level using a BCS-like approximation.…”
Section: Non-interacting Model and Hofstadter Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where U > 0 is the magnitude of the on-site attraction. In cold atom systems, the interaction can derive from an attractive Feshbach resonance [63,66]. We study the effect of this attractive interaction at the mean-field level using a BCS-like approximation.…”
Section: Non-interacting Model and Hofstadter Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key difference between the solid state case and the current set-up is that in the former system the change of sign of the superconducting gap is proposed to be realized by proximity effect with an unconventional superconductor (such as d-wave or s ± wave, which change sign in momentum space), while in our work the change of sign of the superconducting gap is due to a soliton in the s-wave superfluid. The other significant difference between the two proposals is that, while the proximity effect of unconventional d or s ± wave superconductivity on QSHI in solid state systems has not yet been demonstrated experimentally (and is probably going to be hard) the main ingredients of the same physics within our proposal, namely, the two-component Hofstadter model (thus a QSHI, [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]), on-site attractive interactions and non-zero SC pair potential [60][61][62][63][64][65][66], and creation of dark solitons [67][68][69][70], have all been individually realized in the cold atom systems.…”
Section: Non-interacting Model and Hofstadter Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to choose an appropriate model interaction potential to represent the potential V int (|r 1 − r 2 |). Usually, for a standard Hubbard model for ultracold atoms, V int (r) is replaced by the zero-range delta-type pseudopotential which is found to be applicable when the s-wave scattering length a s is much smaller than the length scale of the trap under harmonic approximation [28]. Furthermore, this delta-potential approximation breaks down when the effective range of interaction is finite or large as in the case of magnetic Feshbach resonances [29], particularly when the width of the resonance is very narrow [28,30].…”
Section: Building Up the Models: Calculation Of Interaction Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the real Feshbach resonance is usually characterized by a two-channel model theory, the freedom of the choice of the interaction potential between ultracold atoms enables us to extract the key information from this simple single-channel model. This toy model is effectively equivalent to the two-channel model, and is already sufficient to realistically mimic the narrow Feshbach resonance [22]. We may easily solve the scattering problem within this interatomic potential, in presence and absence of the barrier, respectively.…”
Section: About the Energy-dependent Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%