2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2015.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two cobalt complexes containing different nitronyl nitroxide radicals: Structure and magnetic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For complex 2, at a magnetic field of 70 kOe, the magnetization reaches a maximum of 1.34 Nβ, lower than the being saturated (S=1, g=2.18). This suggests the stronger antiferromagnetic interactions between the Co(II) ion and NITR ligand, which are consistent with the literature results for the Co-NIT systems[33][34][35][36][37].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For complex 2, at a magnetic field of 70 kOe, the magnetization reaches a maximum of 1.34 Nβ, lower than the being saturated (S=1, g=2.18). This suggests the stronger antiferromagnetic interactions between the Co(II) ion and NITR ligand, which are consistent with the literature results for the Co-NIT systems[33][34][35][36][37].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…As illustrated in Figures 5 and 6, the temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of complexes 1 and 2 in the temperature range T > 50 K region can be well fitted depending on equations 1 and 2, leading to J= -292.65 cm −1 ,D= -22.40 cm −1 , zJ=0, g=2.24, R=1.81×10 -6 for complex 1, J= −102.73 cm −1 , D= -34.18 cm −1 , zJ=0, g =2.18, R=2.2×10 -7 for complex 2. The results show the antiferromagnetic interaction between Co(II) ions and nitronyl nitroxides via Co(II)─O coordination bonding is very strong, which is agreement with those lectures [25,27,[30][31][32][33][34][35]. For complexes 1 and 2, the magnetization versus field curve obtained at 2 K are depicted in Based on the structures of complexes 1 and 2, the results illustrated that facts: because the octahedral Co(II) ion has a d electron configuration of (t2g) 5 -(e g) 2 in high spin state, orbital overlaps between the magnetic orbitals of Co dπ (t2g) and NITR π* should be appreciable, giving rise to antiferromagnetic coupling [38][39][40].…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For example, Jian et al reported a moderate value of −15.4 cm –1 for the Co II –Rad interaction within an azido-bridged binuclear complex . Very weak antiferromagnetic interactions have been observed by Zhang et al in two cobalt­(II)–nitronyl–nitroxide complexes …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…27 Very weak antiferromagnetic interactions have been observed by Zhang et al in two cobalt(II)−nitronyl−nitroxide complexes. 28 Ac magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed for [Co II Dy III (L 4 H)(hfac) 5 ] 5a, under zero dc magnetic field, showing tunneling of the magnetization for the lowest temperatures (Figure S5). Therefore, the ac measurements were also performed under a static dc field (1500 Oe), revealing the occurrence of slow relaxation of the magnetization below 28 K for the available frequencies, which is quite high for such systems (Figure 7).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%