2022
DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2127196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-component systems regulate bacterial virulence in response to the host gastrointestinal environment and metabolic cues

Abstract: Two-component systems are ubiquitous signaling mechanisms in bacteria that enable intracellular changes from extracellular cues. These bacterial regulatory systems couple external stimuli to control genetic expression via an autophosphorylation cascade that transduces membrane signals to intracellular locations, thereby allowing bacteria to rapidly adapt to the changing environmental conditions. Well known to control basic cellular processes, it is evident that two-component systems also exercise control over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-component systems of bacteria play an important role in adapting to new environmental conditions by sensing environmental signals and regulating the expression of certain genes [32] . OmpF and OmpC are two major pore proteins in the outer membrane of bacteria, through which hydrophilic substances can enter the cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-component systems of bacteria play an important role in adapting to new environmental conditions by sensing environmental signals and regulating the expression of certain genes [32] . OmpF and OmpC are two major pore proteins in the outer membrane of bacteria, through which hydrophilic substances can enter the cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-component signaling pathways are critical to bacterial pathogenesis and thus remain a highly active area of investigation across a broad array of major human pathogens ( 61 63 ). Herein, we delineate the global binding characteristics of the critical streptococcal response regulator CovR, in both a wild-type emm3 GAS and a CovS phosphatase-inactive strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have sought to unravel the individual effect of probiotics, commensals, or pathogens on the host, but probiotic-pathogen interactions at the host interface remains an understudied field that is being complicated by the genomic variation of Salmonella ( Gupta et al, 2019 ), strain variation in bifidobacteria ( LoCascio et al, 2010 ; Díaz et al, 2021 ), and the variation in ecology of the gut between age groups ( Voreades et al, 2014 ; Laforest-Lapointe and Arrieta, 2017 ). A steady increase in literature suggesting interspecies communication (i.e., community cross talk) exerts some control over the expression of virulence genes in enteric pathogens further highlights the need to define biochemical and genomic underpinnings of these interactions ( Kendall and Sperandio, 2007 ; Shaw et al, 2022 ). The modulation of microbial activity by neighboring gut microbes via chemical signaling, for instance by widely conserved quorum response transcription factor sdiA in Salmonella ( Plitnick et al, 2021 ), suggests microbe-microbe interactions via small metabolites are a significant factor in the infection process of enteric pathogens and potentially also in the response to probiotic interactions ( Thompson et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%