2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-criteria method for comparing real-valued and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, IFST does not only contain operations which are compatible on fuzzy sets, but also such operations which cannot be expressed in the framework of the regular fuzzy set theory [34].…”
Section: Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IFST does not only contain operations which are compatible on fuzzy sets, but also such operations which cannot be expressed in the framework of the regular fuzzy set theory [34].…”
Section: Basic Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods developed for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM problems can be classified into three types: (1) the weighted average aggregation operator approaches, which aggregate the information using different degrees of importance to the arguments [2,9,11,13,15]; (2) the score function methods, which incorporate the membership and non-membership degrees to rank the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs) in the decision-making process [8,14,[16][17][18][19]; and (3) the entropy measure methods, which focus on the discrimination among data by measuring uncertain information [12,[20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the advantage of dealing with uncertain information, many methods on IVIFS have been advanced to solve fuzzy MCDM problems (cf. Park et al, 2009;Nayagam et al, 2011;Intepe et al, 2013;Dymova et al, 2013). The above researches, however, generally studied the problems under the expected utility theory framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%