2016
DOI: 10.1177/2158244015625445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Cross-Platform Programs for Inferences and Interval Estimation About Indirect Effects in Mediational Models

Abstract: In this article, we describe two new programs that compute both p-values and confidence intervals (CI) for the indirect effect in mediational models, including (a) a p-value based on the partial posterior method, which we refer to as p 3Nconstitute a single p-value for the indirect effect while performing substantially better in terms of Type I and II error rates. Furthermore, we include a memory efficient computational algorithm for CI HB and CI MC that allows for precision beyond that in existing alternativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Competence had a positive effect on envy, β = .447, p = .020 [0.071, .824], and admiration, β = .475, p = .005, [0.146, 804]. We calculated indirect effects of contact on emotions via warmth and competence using the partial posterior p ‐value calculator with normal approximation method (Falk & Biesanz, ) . All indirect effect of contact via warmth emerged as significant, admiration, p = .0325, contempt, p = .0095, envy, p < .001, and pity, p = .0036.…”
Section: Results Study 1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competence had a positive effect on envy, β = .447, p = .020 [0.071, .824], and admiration, β = .475, p = .005, [0.146, 804]. We calculated indirect effects of contact on emotions via warmth and competence using the partial posterior p ‐value calculator with normal approximation method (Falk & Biesanz, ) . All indirect effect of contact via warmth emerged as significant, admiration, p = .0325, contempt, p = .0095, envy, p < .001, and pity, p = .0036.…”
Section: Results Study 1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses to obtain mediation p values were implemented using Java-based freeware (Biesanz et al, 2010). Finally, an experiment-wise α adjustment to correct for multiple mediation tests was implemented using False Discovery Rate (Falk and Biesanz, 2016). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indicates good fit (Kline, 2015). The size and significance of indirect effects were tested with a calculator using a Monte Carlo approach, which is appropriate for structural equation models (Falk & Biesanz, 2016). Below we explain the six models we tested for each of the hypotheses.…”
Section: Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%