2016
DOI: 10.1002/polb.24123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two crystal populations with different melting/reorganization kinetics of isothermally crystallized polyamide 6

Abstract: Differential scanning calorimetry and fast scanning chip calorimetry heating experiments were carried out in a wide range of rates of temperature change from 0.2 to 60,000 K s−1 for isothermally crystallized polyamide 6. Multiple melting peaks were observed. With increasing heating rate, the highest‐temperature endotherm shifts toward lower temperatures and finally disappears due to suppression of the reorganization. The critical heating rate to suppress reorganization was 15–50 times higher than the critical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
37
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) is a powerful method to overcome this limitation and to investigate melting and crystallization kinetics in a wide temperature range without unwanted crystallization during temperature scanning . Researchers have also succeeded in analyzing melting and/or crystallization kinetics of polyethylene (PE), polyamide 6 (PA6), poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK), poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) . Regarding PPS, the crystallization behavior was reported using DSC and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) .…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) is a powerful method to overcome this limitation and to investigate melting and crystallization kinetics in a wide temperature range without unwanted crystallization during temperature scanning . Researchers have also succeeded in analyzing melting and/or crystallization kinetics of polyethylene (PE), polyamide 6 (PA6), poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK), poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) . Regarding PPS, the crystallization behavior was reported using DSC and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) .…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…(11) and (12), the cooling rate dependence of total enthalpy change in Figure 8 is fitted by the following function: Then, taking into account, eqs.…”
Section: Secondary Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Nevertheless, the temperature range for direct isothermal crystallization studies using conventional calorimeters is, for most polymers, limited to regions close to the melting temperature, where crystallization is reasonably slow. 9 FSC has in the past been proven successful to achieve the goal for polyamide (PA), 11 poly ether ether ketone (PEEK), 12 polyethylene (PE), [13][14][15] poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET), 16,17 isotactic polypropylene (iPP), [18][19][20][21] isotactic polystyrene (iPS), 22 poly L-lactic acid (PLLA), 23 PBT, [24][25][26][27] or poly (E2caprolactone) (PCL), [28][29][30][31] to name a few. Fast scanning calorimetry (FSC) is a powerful method to overcome this limitation and to investigate nucleation and crystal growth kinetics without unwanted crystallization during cooling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marand and co‐workers have reported that the lowest‐temperature peak was the melting of crystals formed during secondary crystallization, the middle‐temperature peak was the melting of primary crystallization, whereas the highest‐temperature peak was the melting of reorganized crystals . There exist other explanations for the low‐temperature melting peaks . Anyway, the heating curves shown in Figure reveal that the heating faster than 2000 K s −1 can effectively suppress the highest melting peak caused by the reorganization of PA crystals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%