2003
DOI: 10.1038/nsb923
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two crystal structures demonstrate large conformational changes in the eukaryotic ribosomal translocase

Abstract: Two crystal structures of yeast translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2) were determined: the apo form at 2.9 A resolution and eEF2 in the presence of the translocation inhibitor sordarin at 2.1 A resolution. The overall conformation of apo eEF2 is similar to that of its prokaryotic homolog elongation factor G (EF-G) in complex with GDP. Upon sordarin binding, the three tRNA-mimicking C-terminal domains undergo substantial conformational changes, while the three N-terminal domains containing the nucleotide-bindi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
206
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
206
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to EF-Tu, EF-G contains a GЈ subdomain, which is invariably inserted between ␣-helices D G and E G (5). The GЈ subdomain is also present in the same location in EF-2, the eukaryotic cytoplasmic homolog of EF-G (6). However, the GЈ subdomains of EF-G and EF-2 are unrelated in their amino acid sequences and tertiary structures.…”
Section: Together These Results Provide Evidence For Functionally Immentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to EF-Tu, EF-G contains a GЈ subdomain, which is invariably inserted between ␣-helices D G and E G (5). The GЈ subdomain is also present in the same location in EF-2, the eukaryotic cytoplasmic homolog of EF-G (6). However, the GЈ subdomains of EF-G and EF-2 are unrelated in their amino acid sequences and tertiary structures.…”
Section: Together These Results Provide Evidence For Functionally Immentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Experiments in which L7/L12 was replaced with P proteins on the E. coli ribosome demonstrated functionality of the eukaryotic factors on these hybrid ribosomes (38). Considered in light of our present results, we speculate that the specificity determinants of EF-G and EF-2 may involve the GЈ subdomains of these factors, which have unrelated sequences and tertiary structures (6). The specificity determinants of EF-Tu and EF-1␣ remain unknown, but it is interesting to note that their G domains differ by the addition or deletion of several ␣-helices (39), and their shared D G helices have different sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the structures of prokaryotic (formerly termed EF-G) 23 and eukaryotic EF2 24 have also been elucidated, revealing an overall shape similarity ("macromolecular mimicry") 25 between EF2‚GDP and EF1A‚GTP‚tRNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general problem appears to be the toxicity of high selenium concentrations to eukaryotic cells, which is somewhat surprising, because SeMet has been shown previously to be functional when incorporated into (S)-adenosylmethionine (7). The use of an industrial strain of yeast allowed the preparation of a SeMet derivative of translation elongation factor 2 (8). However, although this approach works for a very highly expressed endogenous protein, because of the difficulty in applying molecular genetic approaches in industrial strains it is not applicable to conditions where the chromosomal gene encoding the protein must be deleted or the protein of interest must be expressed from a plasmid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%