Two Decades of Behavioral Research on Analytical Procedures: What Have We Learned?

Abstract

SUMMARY This paper presents a comprehensive review of behavioral research on external auditors' use of analytical procedures published over the past two decades. We frame our review around four phases of the analytical procedures process: develop an expectation, establish a tolerable difference, compare the expectation to the recorded amount and investigate significant differences, and evaluate explanations and corroborative evidence. We find that while considerable research has focused on auditors' performance of the latter phases of the analytical procedures process (i.e., investigate significant differences and evaluate explanations and evidence), relatively less research has focused on the initial phases of the process (i.e., setting expectations and establishing thresholds). We also find that prior research has primarily focused on the preliminary and substantive analytical procedure settings with little research examining auditors' judgments and decisions when using analytical procedures at the overall review stage of the audit engagement. Finally, we summarize the significant findings from research in each phase and provide a number of research questions whose answers could improve our understanding and the performance of analytical procedures. Data Availability: All articles are publicly available.

The Impact of Using Analytical Procedures on Reducing the Cost of Tax Audit "The Jordanian Income and Sales Tax Department"

“…The auditor can adopt the following four basic steps to make full advantage of the analytical procedures (Messier et al, 2013;Soltani., 2007;Knechel and Salterio, 2016):…”

Analitinės procedūros besikeičiančio verslo įmonių audito kontekste

“…Analitinių procedūrų panaudojimas "patikrinimui iš esmės" leidžia sumažinti kontrolės priemonių ir detalių audito testų kiekį, taip gaunant nemažos ekonominės naudos. Atliktų tyrimų duomenimis (Blocher, Patterson, 1996;Messier, Simon, Smith, 2013), analitinėms procedūroms paprastai sunaudojama daug mažiau laiko, negu ūkinių operacijų ar sąskaitų likučių testams. Bet auditoriai turi gana atsargiai vertinti analitinių procedūrų panaudojimo rezultatų patikimumą.…”

Riset Eksperimental Pengauditan: Evolusi Dan Topik Kontemporer

“…Riset dalam konteks prosedur analitis sebelumnya (Brewster 2011;Yen 2012) memiliki potensi luas untuk diekstensi lebih lanjut. Messier, Simon, dan Smith (2013) mereview riset-riset dalam konteks prosedur analitis menyimpulkan bahwa tatanan pengauditan dalam tim maupun proses review atas pekerjaan audit serta pengalaman audit dapat memengaruhi pertimbangan auditor. Dengan demikian, REP dalam konteks prosedur analitis berpotensi untuk dikembangkan lebih lanjut dengan penugasan kelompok maupun intervensi pimpinan atas pekerjaan auditor pemula (novice).…”