2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-012-9653-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two derivative-free projection approaches for systems of large-scale nonlinear monotone equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is positive semidefinite, we have that J is also positive semidefinite. [26,34,45,20,1]. Inspired by a pioneer work [34], a class of iterative methods for solving nonlinear (smooth) monotone equations were proposed in recent years [45,20,1].…”
Section: Monotonicity Of Fixed-point Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is positive semidefinite, we have that J is also positive semidefinite. [26,34,45,20,1]. Inspired by a pioneer work [34], a class of iterative methods for solving nonlinear (smooth) monotone equations were proposed in recent years [45,20,1].…”
Section: Monotonicity Of Fixed-point Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible ways to determine the direction d k satisfying (15). For example, the gradient descent direction and some kind of spectral gradient direction and conjugate gradient directions are satisfying these conditions, see [3,45]. Newton and quasi-Newton directions can satisfy (15) with some more assumptions, see [24,25].…”
Section: New Algorithm and Its Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that Newton's method can be enhanced to obtain the global convergence, which is the convergence to a stationary point from an arbitrary starting point x 0 that may be far away from it. A globally convergent modification of Newton's method is called damped Newton's method exploiting Newton's direction (3) and a line search similar to that discussed in Algorithm 1. The sequence produced by Algorithm 1 converges to an -solution x * satisfying ∇f (x * ) < , which is by no means sufficient to guarantee that x * is a local minimizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to complexity, in the past five decades, numerous algorithms and some software packages in virtue of those powerful algorithms have been developed for solving the nonlinear system of equations. See, for example, [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and the references therein. Nevertheless, in practice, no any algorithm can efficiently solve all the systems of equations arising from sciences and engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming at solution of problem (1), many efficient methods were developed recently. Only by incomplete enumeration, we here mention the trust region method [19], the Newton and the quasi-Newton methods [4][5][6]19], the Gauss-Newton methods [7,8], the Levenberg-Marquardt methods [20][21][22], the derivative-free methods and its modified versions [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][23][24][25][26][27], the derivative-free conjugate gradient projection method [14], the modified PRP (Polak-Ribière-Polyak) conjugate gradient method [11], the TPRP method [10], the PRP-type method [28], the projection method [23], the FR-type method [9], and the modified spectral conjugate gradient projection method [13]. Summarily, the spectral Hindawi…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%