1994
DOI: 10.1016/1011-1344(94)07016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two different mechanisms of low-intensity laser photobiological effects on Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, the laser-induced transient heating could increase ROS production and lipid peroxidation [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the laser-induced transient heating could increase ROS production and lipid peroxidation [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,14,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] This evidence implies cytochrome C oxidase absorption, over other possible elements of the electron transport chain. Eells's group, for example, has demonstrated that low-intensity red light (670 nm) can modulate the effects of molecules known to directly inhibit cytochrome C oxidase activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Let us cite two experimental graphs as an example, that have also other interesting features (Figures 4 and 5). 58,59 Similar effect is certainly not observed in photobiology (see Figure 1). The first graph (Figure 4) is interesting in that ED (0.1 J/ cm 2) for pulsed lasers is ten times less than for continuous lasers and also for IR spectrum (20 J/cm 2 ) in a similar experimental model (E. coli proliferation), 60 which indicates greater efficiency of pulsed mode.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Biological (Therapeutic) Action Of Low-intensimentioning
confidence: 54%