Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study

Škulec, Roman; Callerova, Jitka; Vojtisek, Petr; Černý, Vladimír

doi:10.1007/s11739-019-02226-w

Cited by 13 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An RCT study from 2020, Skulec et al with 300 participants showed that there was a significant shorter procedure time in the intervention group. 27…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Efficacy of Nurse-Performed Ultrasound Guidance Compared with the Conventional Cannulation Technique in Patients with Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Systematic Review

Anderssen

Wang

Fjallheim

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this review is to highlight the efficacy of nurse-performed ultrasound guidance compared with the conventional cannulation technique in patients with difficult peripheral intravenous access. Design: A systematic litterature review. Data sources: The CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched for articles from the period 2011-2021. Method: The following search words were used: peripheral intravenous AND ultrasonography OR ultrasound guided AND catheterization, peripheral/methods. The keyword catheterization, peripheral/methods was found via MeSH Terms (Medical Subject Headings) which PubMed recommended as keyword within the intervention of the conventional cannulation technique. Results: 2 out of 3 articles prove that success rate on the first attempt (primary outcome) was significantly higher in the nurse-performed ultrasound-guided technique compared with the conventional palpation technique. The results of the secondary outcomes; time consumption, complications, patient satisfaction and nurse satisfaction between the two groups proved to be heterogeneous. Conclusion: Nurse-performed ultrasound guidance in hospital wards increases the success rate in patients with difficult peripheral intravenous access. Keywords: efficacy, literature review, nurse-performed, peripheral intravenous access, ultrasound guidance.

show abstract

“…An RCT study from 2020, Skulec et al with 300 participants showed that there was a significant shorter procedure time in the intervention group. 27…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Efficacy of Nurse-Performed Ultrasound Guidance Compared with the Conventional Cannulation Technique in Patients with Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Systematic Review

Anderssen

Wang

Fjallheim

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The summary results are depicted below in addition to a summary in Table 2. 4,5,9,10,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three out of the 16 studies examined paramedic application of USGPIVA, two within the ED and one out-of-hospital. 5,18,19 Each study measured different outcomes making it difficult to compare and evaluate performance. Acuña, et al aimed to evaluate the performance of a handheld POCUS device as used by paramedics and nurses to perform USGPIVA in the ED.…”

Section: Scan Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4 Failure of the first attempt has been reported to occur in up to 67% of patients requiring subsequent or multiple punctures. 5 Ultrasound-guided PIVA (USGPIVA) occurs routinely in the hospital setting when difficulty is either predicted or encountered. In-hospital clinical studies indicate that ultrasound guidance significantly improves the overall success rate of PIVA and reduces the number of punctures required, time to successful PIVA, physician intervention, and rate of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Paired with a predictive A-DIVA scale, the adoption of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can significantly improve first attempt success, reduce the occurrence of multiple punctures, and reduce overall time to successful PIVA. 5,13 The efficacy of USGPIVA in-hospital is firmly established when performed by physicians, 14 but such data are not available for non-physicians, particularly in the out-of-hospital environment. This paper aimed to identify the available evidence for the utility of POCUS in anticipated difficult PIVA by non-physicians.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review

Burton

Donovan

Jones

et al. 2022

Prehosp. Disaster med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Non-physician performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a diagnostic adjunct with the potential to enhance current practice. The scope of POCUS utility is broad and well-established in-hospital, yet limited research has occurred in the out-of-hospital environment. Many physician-based studies expound the value of POCUS in the acute setting as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool. This study utilized a scoping review methodology to map the literature pertaining to non-physician use of POCUS to improve success of peripheral intravenous access (PIVA), especially in patients predicted to be difficult to cannulate. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from January 1, 1990 through April 15, 2021. A thorough search of the grey literature and reference lists of relevant articles was also performed to identify additional studies. Articles were included if they examined non-physician utilization of ultrasound-guided PIVA (USGPIVA) for patients anticipated to be difficult to cannulate. Results: A total of 158 articles were identified. A total of 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of participants had varied experience with ultrasound, making accurate comparison difficult. Training and education were non-standardized, as was the approach to determining difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Despite this, the majority of the studies demonstrated high first attempt and overall success rates for PIVA performed by non-physicians. Conclusion: Non-physician USGPIVA appears to be a superior method for PIVA when difficulty is anticipated. Additional benefits include reduced requirement for central venous catheter (CVC) or intraosseous (IO) needle placement. Paramedics, nurses, and emergency department (ED) technicians are able to achieve competence in this skill with relatively little training. Further research is required to explore the utility of this practice in the out-of-hospital environment.

show abstract

Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults

Tada

Yamada

Matsumoto³

et al. 2022

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study

Cited by 13 publications

References 26 publications

The Efficacy of Nurse-Performed Ultrasound Guidance Compared with the Conventional Cannulation Technique in Patients with Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Systematic Review

The Efficacy of Nurse-Performed Ultrasound Guidance Compared with the Conventional Cannulation Technique in Patients with Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Systematic Review

Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review

Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About