2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional fractal-like finite element method for thermoelastic crack analysis

Abstract: The fractal-like finite element method has been proved to be very efficient and accurate in two-dimensional static and dynamic crack problems. In this paper, we extend our previous study to include the thermal effect for two-dimensional isotropic thermal crack problems. Both the temperature intensity factor and thermal stress intensity factor can be calculated directly. The temperature distribution is first found, which is imposed thereafter as a thermal load in the elastic problem. The transformation function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results computed by the singular ES-FEM (GSM) using a coarse mesh with 20 Â 40 Â 2 elements are compared with those computed by other methods in Table 1. The present results agree well with values reported in the literatures, and the absolute value of relative difference with respect to the extended finite element method (XFEM) varies between 0.09% and 0.73% [9], with respect to the extended element free Galerkin method (XEFG) varies between 0.20% and 0.83% [37], and with respect to the fractal-like finite element method (FFEM) varies between 0.07% and 0.20% [40].…”
Section: Square Plate With a Central Horizontal Cracksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present results computed by the singular ES-FEM (GSM) using a coarse mesh with 20 Â 40 Â 2 elements are compared with those computed by other methods in Table 1. The present results agree well with values reported in the literatures, and the absolute value of relative difference with respect to the extended finite element method (XFEM) varies between 0.09% and 0.73% [9], with respect to the extended element free Galerkin method (XEFG) varies between 0.20% and 0.83% [37], and with respect to the fractal-like finite element method (FFEM) varies between 0.07% and 0.20% [40].…”
Section: Square Plate With a Central Horizontal Cracksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…He et al [18] derived a three-dimensional crack opening displacement correlation formula to calculate stress intensity factors for 20-node collapsed isoparametric quarter-point elements. Tsang et al [19] developed a fractal-like finite element mesh for thermoelastic crack analysis using SIF as the primary unknowns using conventional finite elements and no singular element is required. Coupling with FEM is simple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSEM is an improved version of the fractallike finite-element method (Leung et al 2000;Tsang et al 2004Tsang et al , 2007. The SSEM is designed to be easy to use for engineering purposes such that crack analysis can be done by a normal stress analyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The super singular element method (SSEM) is a semi-analytical method, which combines the efficiency and accuracy of analytical solutions and the agility of standard finite-element method. The SSEM is an improved version of the fractallike finite-element method (Leung et al 2000;Tsang et al 2004Tsang et al , 2007. The SSEM is designed to be easy to use for engineering purposes such that crack analysis can be done by a normal stress analyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%