2023
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.479001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional freeform reflector design with a scattering surface

Abstract: We combine two-dimensional freeform reflector design with a scattering surface modeled using microfacets, i.e., small, specular, surfaces representing surface roughness. The model resulted in a convolution integral for the scattered light intensity distribution, which yields an inverse specular problem after deconvolution. Thus, the shape of a reflector with a scattering surface may be computed using deconvolution, followed by solving the typical inverse problem of specular reflector design. We found that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 15 shows the effect that scattering has on the reflector, where the base reflector was taken as the specular reflector achieving h given f , i.e., with σ = 0 so that p is a delta function and g ≡ h. Successive reflectors have increasing values of σ , associated with more and more scattering up to σ = 0.1. As expected, more scattering requires more modification of the reflector versus the base one, and we see variations in height up to a few percent of the size of the reflectors, which is consistent with previous observations we made in the two-dimensional case [11]. As noted there, variations of this order of magnitude are typically considered manufacturable.…”
Section: B Example #2: Varying Amounts Of Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 15 shows the effect that scattering has on the reflector, where the base reflector was taken as the specular reflector achieving h given f , i.e., with σ = 0 so that p is a delta function and g ≡ h. Successive reflectors have increasing values of σ , associated with more and more scattering up to σ = 0.1. As expected, more scattering requires more modification of the reflector versus the base one, and we see variations in height up to a few percent of the size of the reflectors, which is consistent with previous observations we made in the two-dimensional case [11]. As noted there, variations of this order of magnitude are typically considered manufacturable.…”
Section: B Example #2: Varying Amounts Of Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our future goal is to expand on the approach we introduced in [11] by applying it to three dimensions. In that work, we utilized microfacets to model the rough surface that causes light scattering.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is currently solved by numerically solving system-specific differential equations or through optimization, with every step validated using a (non-differentiable) non-sequential ray tracer (Wu et al, 2018). Great effort is involved in generalizing these methods to account for varying amounts of optical surfaces (Anthonissen et al, 2021), their optical surface and volume properties (Kronberg et al, 2022;Lippman and Schmidt, 2020), or the source model (Muschaweck, 2022;Tukker, 2007;Sorgato et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%