2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional high-end ultrasound imaging compared to intraoperative MRI during resection of low-grade gliomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, in using cioUS, a common drawback is the significant drop of accuracy during surgery. The increase of surgical-induced artifacts in this US modality renders discrimination of pathological tissue from blood or normal brain tissue difficult [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, in using cioUS, a common drawback is the significant drop of accuracy during surgery. The increase of surgical-induced artifacts in this US modality renders discrimination of pathological tissue from blood or normal brain tissue difficult [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the obtained images cannot reliably differentiate between tumor and artifact or between tumor and normal brain. 6 As a result, the reliability of intraoperative ultrasonography has been questioned. 3,17,22 Intraoperative MRI is clearly the most reliable method for determining tumor margins during surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] The two-dimensional (2-D) US image acquisition is significantly faster than ioMRI and scans can be performed multiple times during surgery, without major interruption of the workflow. 24 US imaging can be also integrated with neuronavigation systems. 34 Today the technology and image quality of ultrasound have been improved significantly, providing the surgeon with a useful way to identify tumors and make a preliminary classification of low-grade or high-grade glioma.…”
Section: Intraoperative Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 However, two shortcomings are that ioUS provides lower sensitivity and specificity in the detection of small or superficial tumor remnants. 24 Furthermore, the image acquisition and interpretation are subjective and require adequate training and experience. 24 Other confounding factors that may affect the interpretation of the ioUS image are the presence of dropouts from blood, cottonoids, or proteinaceous fluid, which can all reduce the ultrasound image quality, or the contrast of the disrupted BBB.…”
Section: Intraoperative Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation