2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2173310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Magnetic Recording at 10 $\hbox{Tbits/in}^{2}$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main effect and two-interaction effect of the design parameters can be evaluated based on the responses of factorial runs (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), and the quadratic effect can be evaluated based on the axial and center runs (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Strength of each effect can be indicated by the percentagewise absolute value of the coefficient in RSM model, as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Simulation Design Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main effect and two-interaction effect of the design parameters can be evaluated based on the responses of factorial runs (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), and the quadratic effect can be evaluated based on the axial and center runs (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Strength of each effect can be indicated by the percentagewise absolute value of the coefficient in RSM model, as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Simulation Design Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason is the spatial dependence of the writing field gradient. For a writing head design such as that proposed in [13], the optimal field gradient is confined to a small area in the media plane; thus, the medium coercivity must be carefully designed to achieve improved writing performance.…”
Section: Simulation Design Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reader SNR (without including media noise) for sampling per 2 nm was about 21 dB relative to the long wavelength signal, where the noises consist of Johnson noise and magnetization noise [10], [11]. During readback, the playback signal from the conventional MR head is numerically evaluated with the physically accurate reciprocity principle applied to a head magnetic potential from a finite difference code [12], [13]. The reciprocity principle indicates that the playback signal equals the convolution of the head magnetic potential and the divergence of the media magnetization [12].…”
Section: Reader Designmentioning
confidence: 99%