2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.11.044031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Mapping Separating the Acoustic Radiation Force and Streaming in Microfluidics

Abstract: In microscale fluids, fields of physical force and streaming play central roles in manipulating and tweezing objects, but it is difficult to disentangle and obtain accurate pictures of them. We develop a multiradius microparticle image velocimetry (MRμPIV) protocol to solve this problem in miniaturized spaces. By using several monodisperse suspensions of spherical particles, each with its own specific particle radius, two-dimensional (2D) mapping separating the fields of radiation force and streaming is demons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32][33][34] The differences in and applications of these two acoustic effects have been elaborated in a series of references. [35][36][37] In recent years, to obtain sophisticated distributions of acoustic radiation forces and acoustic streaming fields, immense numbers of concrete research studies of acoustofluidic fields have been carried out for applications in particle patterning, tissue/organ engineering, and other physico-chemical and biomedical reactions. [29,30,38,39] Considering that the spatial variations in sound intensity and Reynolds stress in the Navier-Stokes equations are the results of time averaging of the sound field distribution, the acoustic radiation force and acoustic streaming field are significantly influenced by the input frequency, oscillation amplitude, and initial phase differences of multiple vibration sources, the acoustofluidic characteristics of different media, and the shape and distribution of fluid-solid interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] The differences in and applications of these two acoustic effects have been elaborated in a series of references. [35][36][37] In recent years, to obtain sophisticated distributions of acoustic radiation forces and acoustic streaming fields, immense numbers of concrete research studies of acoustofluidic fields have been carried out for applications in particle patterning, tissue/organ engineering, and other physico-chemical and biomedical reactions. [29,30,38,39] Considering that the spatial variations in sound intensity and Reynolds stress in the Navier-Stokes equations are the results of time averaging of the sound field distribution, the acoustic radiation force and acoustic streaming field are significantly influenced by the input frequency, oscillation amplitude, and initial phase differences of multiple vibration sources, the acoustofluidic characteristics of different media, and the shape and distribution of fluid-solid interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustofluidics may be an alternative solution for addressing the challenges in measuring CTC–matrix interaction. By introduction of bulk acoustic waves or surface acoustic waves into a microfluidic channel/chamber, the acoustofluidic technique normally uses acoustic radiation force and Stokes drag force induced by acoustic streaming to manipulate biological particles or fluids. Because of the unique nature of acoustic waves, the acoustofluidic technique can achieve various biomanipulations in a label-free, contactless, and highly biocompatible manner. The acoustic radiation force has been used to pattern, transport, separate, and sort cells and particles for broad application in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug screening, and disease detection and treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%