2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2020)140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two dimensional $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (0, 4) quivers dual to AdS3 solutions in massive IIA

Abstract: In this paper we discuss an infinite family of new solutions in massive Type IIA supergravity with AdS 3 ×S 2 factors, preserving N = (0, 4) SUSY. After studying geometrical aspects of the backgrounds we propose a duality with a precise family of quivers that flow to (0,4) fixed points at low energies. These quivers consist on two families of (4,4) linear quivers coupled by matter fields. We present various tests of our proposal.Dedicated to the memory of Steven S. Gubser. 1 ylozano@uniovi.es 2

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
230
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(117 reference statements)
4
230
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This strongly suggests that a similar description should be at play for the AdS 2 solution. As in similar examples in which non-Abelian T-duality has been applied to holography [83][84][85][86][87][88][89], the solution constructed through non-Abelian T-duality would not be describing the same physics as the type IIA seed solution, which would be consistent with the fact that non-Abelian T-duality has not been proved to be a string theory symmetry [90,91].…”
Section: Uplift To M-theorymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This strongly suggests that a similar description should be at play for the AdS 2 solution. As in similar examples in which non-Abelian T-duality has been applied to holography [83][84][85][86][87][88][89], the solution constructed through non-Abelian T-duality would not be describing the same physics as the type IIA seed solution, which would be consistent with the fact that non-Abelian T-duality has not been proved to be a string theory symmetry [90,91].…”
Section: Uplift To M-theorymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Following [27], we will be interested in the case of a finite interval I ρ where bothĥ 4 and h 8 vanish at both ends of the interval. So, to start fixing conventions, let us set I ρ = [0, ρ * ] and h 4 (ρ) = h 8 (ρ) = 0, whenρ is equal to 0 and ρ * .…”
Section: Summary Of Class I Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, to start fixing conventions, let us set I ρ = [0, ρ * ] and h 4 (ρ) = h 8 (ρ) = 0, whenρ is equal to 0 and ρ * . It is convenient [27] to set ρ * = 2π(P + 1), with P a large integer. On the other hand, u vanishes only at ρ = 0.…”
Section: Summary Of Class I Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exceptions to this trend include a classification of purely NS  = (2, 2) solutions in [25], large  = (4, 0) in Mtheory [26] and massive IIA, [36] and small  = (4, 0) in massive IIA. [27][28][29][30] These examples, while certainly of great merit, still only cover a small subset of possible superconfromal algebras -see [31] for a complete list that may be embedded into ten-and eleven-dimensional supergravity 1 . Rather less "vanilla" options, were presented in [33] where solutions with F(4) and G(3) supergroups were constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%