2012
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐dimensional non‐Newtonian injection molding with a new control volume FEM/volume of fluid method

Abstract: SUMMARYA new method based on volume of fluid for interface tracking in the simulation of injection molding is presented. The proposed method is comprised of two main stages: accumulation and distribution of the volume fraction. In the first stage the equation for the volume fraction with a noninterfacial flux condition is solved. In the second stage the accumulated volume of fluid that arises as a consequence of the application of the first one is dispersed. This procedure guarantees that the fluid fills the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the rheological theory, the viscosity of non-Newtonian fluid will be affected by the velocity gradient. We take the power-law model [26,27] to describe a nonlinear relation between shear stress and the rate of deformation. e strain rate tensor is denoted as d � (∇u + (∇u) T )/2, and its magnitude is c �…”
Section: Power-law Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the rheological theory, the viscosity of non-Newtonian fluid will be affected by the velocity gradient. We take the power-law model [26,27] to describe a nonlinear relation between shear stress and the rate of deformation. e strain rate tensor is denoted as d � (∇u + (∇u) T )/2, and its magnitude is c �…”
Section: Power-law Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow models for simulating the mold filling process in the early years have been reviewed detailedly by Cardozo. 1 There are also some other reports [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] about simulating the mold filling process in the past 30 years. However, the abovementioned reports main focus the evolution of melt front interface and viscosity effect of polymer melt, the elastic characteristics have not been taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the numerical simulation of the polymer filling process, it mainly involves the solution of Navier‐Stokes (N‐S) equations, the description of the viscoelastic behaviour of the polymer melt, and the capturing of the interface front in the irregular cavity. The finite element method (FEM) has been one of the most popular methods to deal with the two‐phase flow in the filling process. In 2008, Li et al simulated the polymer injection molding process using the adaptive coupled arbitrary Lagrangian‐Eulerian finite element and meshfree method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to simplify the problem, they only considered the Newtonian fluid. In 2013, Salinas et al employed a new control volume FEM/volume of fluid method to model the non‐Newtonian filling process. However, they utilized the power law equation to represent the non‐Newtonian fluid, which is not appropriate to describe the rheological behaviour of the viscoelastic polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%