2023
DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures8050088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Numerical Analysis for TBM Tunneling-Induced Structure Settlement: A Proposed Modeling Method and Parametric Study

Abstract: The construction of tunnels in densely populated urban areas poses a significant challenge in terms of anticipating the settlement that may result from tunnel excavation. This paper presents a new and more realistic modeling method for tunnel excavation using a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM). This method is compared with other reference modeling methods using a validated model of a subsurface tunnel excavated by a TBM with a slurry shield. A parametric study is conducted to investigate the impact of key parameter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective applications of various machine learning (ML) models have been found in geotechnical analysis. These models cover a broad range, including support vector machines (SVMs) [39], multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) [40,41], relevant vector machines (RVMs) [42], decision tree regression (DTR) [43], gradient boosting regression (GBR) [43], K nearest neighbor regression (KNR) [43], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [44], random forest regression (RFR) [43], extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [38,[45][46][47], extreme learning machines (ELMs) [40], symbolic regression (SR) [48,49], and artificial neural networks (ANNs) [50][51][52][53][54]. Table 1 summarizes several studies that employed machine learning in geotechnical engineering.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence As a Predictive Tool In Geotechnical...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective applications of various machine learning (ML) models have been found in geotechnical analysis. These models cover a broad range, including support vector machines (SVMs) [39], multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) [40,41], relevant vector machines (RVMs) [42], decision tree regression (DTR) [43], gradient boosting regression (GBR) [43], K nearest neighbor regression (KNR) [43], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [44], random forest regression (RFR) [43], extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [38,[45][46][47], extreme learning machines (ELMs) [40], symbolic regression (SR) [48,49], and artificial neural networks (ANNs) [50][51][52][53][54]. Table 1 summarizes several studies that employed machine learning in geotechnical engineering.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence As a Predictive Tool In Geotechnical...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to geotechnical data and laboratory geotechnical experiment results and considering the "Code for Design of Composite Structures", model material parameters were determined, as summarized in Table 2. Strata were modeled using entity units with the Mohr-Column model; the initial support was modeled using plate elements with elastic behavior, and the middle wall was modeled using entity units with elastic behavior [3].…”
Section: Model and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid expansion of urban railways, the construction of subway tunnels has progressively revealed the evolution features of enormous burial depth, large sections, and big spans [1][2][3][4][5]. The increase in the number of large-section tunnels has also created some engineering challenges, such as surrounding rock deformation [6][7][8], support structure instability [9][10][11], and lining cracking [12][13][14], which have seriously threatened project construction and operation safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the numerical modeling approach for simulating soil behavior during tunnel excavations, two constitutive models, namely HS (hardening soil) and HSS (hardening soil with small strain stiffness), were selected based on previous studies [6,7,23,30] that recommended their suitability. The numerical simulations were performed using a coarse mesh with local refinement, consisting of 703 elements.…”
Section: D Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study represents an extension of a previous study [23], which primarily focused on the analysis of a single tunnel. In contrast, the current study delves into twin tunnels, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the distinctive interaction effects inherent in this specific tunnel configuration and its impact on surface structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%