1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf00146062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional observations of the velocity field in and around sunspots

Abstract: Doppler spectroheliograms of sunspots and their surroundings have been obtained with a spatial resolution approaching one second of arc and a time resolution of 20 s per frame. Observations of 5 sunspots, located 18 ~ 45 ~ 56 ~ 60 ~ and 72 ~ from the disk center respectively, showed considerable long-lived fine structure and, in particular, indicated the following:(1) The Evershed outflow terminated in spoke-like structures that constitute the ragged outer boundary of the penumbra. Some of these spokes extende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, further away from the sunspot umbra, larger-scale circulations characterised by a surface inflow and a deep (> 10 Mm) outflow are inferred from helioseismic inversions. Several authors studied the structure of the moat flow using Doppler signal (Sheeley Jr and Bhatnagar, 1971;Sheeley Jr, 1972), by tracking surface features, such as granules (Muller and Mena, 1987;Shine et al, 1987) or small-scale magnetic elements (Sheeley Jr, 1972;Harvey and Harvey, 1973;Hagenaar and Shine, 2005), or using helioseismology . One of the conclusions of these studies is that the outflow has properties similar to those of supergranulation (see notably Brickhouse and Labonte, 1988), albeit with a larger velocity ∼ 1 km s -1 .…”
Section: Supergranulation and Flows In Active Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, further away from the sunspot umbra, larger-scale circulations characterised by a surface inflow and a deep (> 10 Mm) outflow are inferred from helioseismic inversions. Several authors studied the structure of the moat flow using Doppler signal (Sheeley Jr and Bhatnagar, 1971;Sheeley Jr, 1972), by tracking surface features, such as granules (Muller and Mena, 1987;Shine et al, 1987) or small-scale magnetic elements (Sheeley Jr, 1972;Harvey and Harvey, 1973;Hagenaar and Shine, 2005), or using helioseismology . One of the conclusions of these studies is that the outflow has properties similar to those of supergranulation (see notably Brickhouse and Labonte, 1988), albeit with a larger velocity ∼ 1 km s -1 .…”
Section: Supergranulation and Flows In Active Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He termed this region a moat. From Doppler spectroheliograms, Sheeley & Bhatnagar (1971) found radially oriented outflows in moats. Sheeley (1972) reported the Doppler speed of the outflows 0.5-1.0 km s −1 for distances 10-20 Mm beyond the outer boundary of the penumbra and suggested that these motions carry small-scale fragments of magnetic flux away from sunspots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic flux is then carried away to the surrounding network throughout the moat (Sheeley 1969;Vrabec 1971;Harvey & Harvey 1973;Wallenhorst & Topka 1982;Muller & Mena 1987;Ryutova et al 1998) which is an annular cell of systematic horizontal outflows, 0.5 to 1 km s −1 , surrounding sunspots in late phases of evolution (Sheeley & Bhatnagar 1971;Sheeley 1972;Muller & Ména 1987). Soon after the discovery of this flow, which is very similar to that found in supergranules, Sheeley (1972) suggested that a decaying sunspot occupies the centre of a supergranular cell, and that small-scale fragments of magnetic flux are carried away from sunspots by the supergranular flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%