2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0106114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional particle simulation of the boundary between a hot pair plasma and magnetized electrons and protons: Out-of-plane magnetic field

Abstract: By means of a particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation, we study the interaction between a uniform magnetized ambient electron–proton plasma at rest and an unmagnetized pair plasma, which we inject at one simulation boundary with a mildly relativistic mean speed and temperature. The magnetic field points out of the simulation plane. The injected pair plasma expels the magnetic field and piles it up at its front. It traps ambient electrons and drags them across the protons. An electric field grows, which accelerates p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This layer is thus capable of slowing down and compressing a pair plasma outflow, which is what we require from a discontinuity. Its width grew to a few proton skin depths at the end of the simulation, which was also observed in the 2D simulations [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This layer is thus capable of slowing down and compressing a pair plasma outflow, which is what we require from a discontinuity. Its width grew to a few proton skin depths at the end of the simulation, which was also observed in the 2D simulations [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This direction was not resolved in the 2D simulation in [32] and the ambient electrons remained cool. Resolving this direction heated the ambient electrons to a relativistic temperature and gave them an exponentially decreasing energy spectrum like the one we observe here [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations