2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c12542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Framework with Enlarged Inter-layer Spacing for Tunable Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

Abstract: Two-dimensional (2D) porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are one of the most promising candidates for photocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR), which however still suffer from the hindered mass transfer during the catalysis procedure associated with the close packing of 2D COF layers due to the strong axial π–π stacking. Herein, condensation between the porphyrinic aldehydes p-MPor-CHO (M = H2, Co, and Ni) and 3,8-diamino-6-phenyl-phenanthridine (DPP) affords new porphyrin-based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the four-step procedures for the photoreduction of CO 2 , including CO 2 adsorption, COOH* formation, CO* generation, and CO desorption, the formations of COOH* (CO 2 * + H + + e – → COOH*) were determined as the rate-determining step in both Co-Por and Ni-Por, with the highest free-energy barriers (1.23 eV for Co-Por and 1.67 eV for Ni-Por). As a result, the better CO 2 reduction performance on JUC-640-Co could be put down to the significantly lower free-energy barrier of Co-Por, compared with its nickelic counterparts, which were well compatible with the previously reported metalloporphyrin-based frameworks …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the four-step procedures for the photoreduction of CO 2 , including CO 2 adsorption, COOH* formation, CO* generation, and CO desorption, the formations of COOH* (CO 2 * + H + + e – → COOH*) were determined as the rate-determining step in both Co-Por and Ni-Por, with the highest free-energy barriers (1.23 eV for Co-Por and 1.67 eV for Ni-Por). As a result, the better CO 2 reduction performance on JUC-640-Co could be put down to the significantly lower free-energy barrier of Co-Por, compared with its nickelic counterparts, which were well compatible with the previously reported metalloporphyrin-based frameworks …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is noteworthy that Fe-soc-O has the highest CO productivity of 1804 μmol g –1 h –1 , while Fe-soc-C has the best CO selectivity of 94.7%. Considering the CO production and selectivity, the Fe-soc-MOFs have comparable performance with some contemporary materials such as ZIF-67, HOF-25-Re, CoPor-DPP-COF, and HOF-25-Ni@GO-10 with a photosensitizer for photocatalytic CO 2 reduction, and the details are summarized in Table S1. All the Fe-soc-MOFs are stable and unchanged during the photocatalytic reactions as evidenced by PXRD, FT-IR, N 2 and CO 2 adsorption isotherms, and SEM images (Figures S7–S9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the strong axial π-π stacking of 2D porphyrin COFs caused the close packing of layers, which hindered mass transfer during the catalysis procedure and further limited the catalytic performance. Wang et al [56] introduced bulky phenyl substituent to the monomer to reduce the axial π-π stacking. The authors synthesized COFs from the condensation of porphyrinic aldehyde p-Mpor-CHO (M = H 2 , Co, and Ni) and 3,8-diamino-6-phenylphenanthridine.…”
Section: Catalytic Single-atom Bearing Porphyrin-and Phthalocyanine-b...mentioning
confidence: 99%