1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.9627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional random-network model with symplectic symmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is close to a numerical result ν = 2.746 ± 0.009 for a SU(2) model published recently [23], but considerably larger than ν = 2.05 ± 0.08 [6] and smaller than ν = 2.88 ± 0.15 as obtained in [21]. In contrast to the critical conductance and critical disorder, the critical exponent is sensitive to the system size as can be seen in figure 4.…”
Section: Critical Parameterssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…which is close to a numerical result ν = 2.746 ± 0.009 for a SU(2) model published recently [23], but considerably larger than ν = 2.05 ± 0.08 [6] and smaller than ν = 2.88 ± 0.15 as obtained in [21]. In contrast to the critical conductance and critical disorder, the critical exponent is sensitive to the system size as can be seen in figure 4.…”
Section: Critical Parameterssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From our conductance data, the critical exponent ν was obtained for the first time using finite size scaling of the calculated electrical two-terminal conductance, which is, unlike the localization length, an easy way to measure physical quantity. With the finite size scaling analysis described in section (2.4), our estimation of the critical exponent gives ν = 2.8 ± 0.04, (11) which is close to a numerical result ν = 2.746 ± 0.009 for a SU(2) model published recently [23], but considerably larger than ν = 2.05 ± 0.08 [6] and smaller than ν = 2.88 ± 0.15 as obtained in [21]. In contrast to the critical conductance and critical disorder, the critical exponent is sensitive to the system size as can be seen in figure 4.…”
Section: Critical Parameterssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in the presence of spin-orbit scattering, the estimates of the exponent ν in 2D are rather scattered e.g. 2.2 [33], 2.5 [47] and 2.8 [48,49], which can not be distinguished from the value of ν = 2.35 ± .03 obtained in the quantum Hall case. This may be due to the fact that the corrections to scaling is larger in 2D [47].…”
Section: Summary and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There has been only very limited success in estimating the critical exponent with field theoretic methods [16,17]. In Table I we tabulate the estimates of the exponent reported in previous numerical studies [4,10,11,12,13,14,15]. There is considerable variation between these estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%