“…The FDH model is, indeed, valid and useful to investigate the radiative effect alone, as in, for example, Fels (1985) and Pawson and Shine (1991), but the comparison with observed temperature needs some attention because the feedback effect of dynamics (and chemistry) is not necessarily small, particularly at high latitudes in winter. The incorporation of dynamical heating, which comes from heat flux due to meridional circulation and planetary and gravity waves, entails a two-dimensional model (e.g., Tie et al, 1994;Kinnison et al, 1994;Gerstel et al, 1995) or three-dimensional model (e.g., Rind et al, 1992;Pitari, 1993;Hansen et al, 1993), thus being beyond the scope of this paper. The evaluation, however, can be economically made, so long as the radiative perturbation is small enough, by adding the radiative heating perturbations obtained in this study as an external heating to on-line calculated heating in general circulation models (GCMs), which include no scattering process, as done by Graf et al (1992) and Graf et al (.1993) .…”