Bacterial nanocellulose (BC)-based composites containing poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA), poly(methacroylcholine chloride) (PMACC) or poly(methacroylcholine hydroxide) (PMACH) were characterized by inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectroscopy, combined with DFT (density functional theory) calculations of model systems. A reasonable match between calculated and experimental spectral lines and their intensities was used to support the vibrational assignment of the observed bands and to validate the possible structures. The differences between the spectra of the nanocomposites and the pure precursors indicate that interactions between the components are stronger for the ionic poly(methacrylate) derivatives than for the neutral counterpart. Displaced anions interact differently with cellulose chains, due to the different ability to compete with the O-H···O hydrogen bonds in cellulose. Hence, the INS is an adequate technique to delve deeper into the structure and dynamics of nanocellulose-based composites, confirming that they are true nanocomposite materials instead of simple mixtures of totally independent domains. Keywords: bacterial nanocellulose; nanocomposites; poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate); poly(methacroylcholine chloride); poly(methacroylcholine hydroxide); inelastic neutron scattering; DFT calculations
IntroductionA tour through the kaleidoscopic portfolio of materials developed in the last decades, clearly shows that composite materials based on cellulose [1], and bacterial nanocellulose (BC) in particular [2], are quite relevant for myriad domains of applications [3][4][5]. In fact, the exopolysaccharide BC, which is biosynthesized by several non-pathogenic bacteria in the form of membranes with a tree-dimensional network of cellulose nanofibrils [6], has shown potential for drug delivery [7-9], wound healing [10,11], bone tissue engineering [12], antimicrobial materials [13], food and food packaging [14,15], water remediation [16,17] and fuel cells [5,18,19], just to mention some fields of application.In terms of production, BC-based nanocomposites can be prepared by in situ and ex situ methodologies [20], which already enabled the combination of BC with a vast array of synthetic polymers Molecules 2020, 25, 1689 2 of 16 (e.g., polyaniline [21] and Nafion [22]) and biopolymers (e.g., lactoferrin [23] and fucoidan [24]), as well as hybrid materials with metal oxides, metal sulphides and metal nanoparticles [4], and graphene and derivatives [25,26], with the aim of enhancing or adding novel properties to the ensuing materials [2]. Among the available methodologies, the in situ polymerization of monomers with, for instance, (metha)acrylate functional groups, is a simple top-down method that promotes the use of BC without altering its valuable and unique three-dimensional structure [2]. Acrylamide [27], acrylic acid [28], glyceryl monomethacrylate [29], 2-ethoxyethyl methacrylate [29], 2-aminoethyl methacrylate [30], methacryloyloxyethyl phosphate [31], N-methacryloyl glycine [7] and bis[2-(me...