2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/eusipco.2016.7760344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two distributed algorithms for the deconvolution of large radio-interferometric multispectral images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of the intermediate variable p is that it allows to write problem (3) in an equivalent form which has a solvable dual problem. This is in contrast with our previous work [24]. This new formulation can be summarized by the following expression:…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Minimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The relevance of the intermediate variable p is that it allows to write problem (3) in an equivalent form which has a solvable dual problem. This is in contrast with our previous work [24]. This new formulation can be summarized by the following expression:…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Minimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In a situation where the number of available compute agents is much less than the number of frequencies at which data are available, this may become problematic. Similar problems have been encountered in radio interferometric imaging where the simultaneous use of all available data is a daunting task for which multiple solutions have been proposed (Meillier et al 2016;Deguignet et al 2016;Onose et al 2016;Onose et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our analysis (which is an extension of our previous work (Yatawatta 2018)) is general and can easily be adopted for specific calibration scenarios such as traditional calibration (without using consensus) or calibration using a scalar data model (single polarization) or direction independent calibration. Furthermore, the same method of analysis can be used to study the performance of other data processing steps in radio interferometry such as imaging (Onose et al 2016;Meillier et al 2016;Deguignet et al 2016;Onose et al 2017) or foreground removal (Chapman et al 2013;Trott et al 2016;Mertens et al 2018). In addition, the same analysis can be applied to other machine learning problems as well, for instance to study over fitting (Tetko et al 1995;Srivastava et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%