2019
DOI: 10.1080/15528030.2019.1669515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Two-eyed seeing’: the integration of spiritual care in Aboriginal residential aged care in South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to this study findings, the staff shortage is related by Goh et al (2017) to the employee turnover and absenteeism who note that low number of staff is the major problem in meeting the personalized care needs of RwD [41]. It is also a common belief that rural aged care homes require more funding than urban facilities to recruit and retain staff and take safety measures in order to support personalized dementia care [14,27].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to this study findings, the staff shortage is related by Goh et al (2017) to the employee turnover and absenteeism who note that low number of staff is the major problem in meeting the personalized care needs of RwD [41]. It is also a common belief that rural aged care homes require more funding than urban facilities to recruit and retain staff and take safety measures in order to support personalized dementia care [14,27].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The reasons for not being able to provide personalized care are: RwD fail to express their needs; and the perspectives of their family members are excluded [24,25]. The exclusion of family members' voice deters the staff in translating the personalized care on the floor [26,27]. Although the participation of family members of RwD in different programs was evident in the study, the inclusion of their voice in developing care plan and providing care was seldom seen.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consequently, the evidence from these studies makes it difficult to apply to other countries and Indigenous populations. Finally, except for the two studies by Sivertsen et al (2019aSivertsen et al ( , 2019b, none of the authors make any reference to each other's work, nor do they build upon the findings of those who have published before them. Despite the limitations noted in this review, it is evident that all studies were concerned with improving patient-centred care and the delivery of health care services for older Indigenous people in ARC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the scoring of quantitative studies (Amir et al, 2019;Borotkanics et al, 2017), we were unable to tell if the study samples were representative of the population under study, due to the small sample sizes of older Indigenous ARC residents. According to the MMAT, all qualitative studies (Mercer, 1996;Sivertsen et al, 2019aSivertsen et al, , 2019b) had high evaluation scores, although one study did not consider the influence of the researcher during interactions with participants (Mercer, 1996). For scores of the mixed-method studies, two had high-quality scores (Dance et al, 2004;Hocking et al, 2019), and one was assigned a low-quality score (Davis, 2005) as only two subsections from the MMAT methodological checklist criteria received a "yes."…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Western biomedical models of care provision do not support or maintain an approach to equity in care [63]. Aboriginal perspectives are often relegated to the margins of health care systems and policies, and there is a call for 'two-eyed seeing' [64], which would mean that Aboriginal and Western world views of health, illness and child wellbeing, including health care systems, need to come together and collaborate. A two-eyed way of seeing means that one learns to see from one eye the strengths of Aboriginal knowledges, and from the other eye, the strengths of Western knowledges, but most importantly to use both eyes together for the benefit of all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%