2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ijcb.2011.6117516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two faces are better than one: Face recognition in group photographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Face attributes are beneficial for multiple applications such as face verification [15,2,25], identification [20], and retrieval. Predicting face attributes from images in the wild is challenging, because of complex face variations such as poses, lightings, and occlusions as shown in Fig.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face attributes are beneficial for multiple applications such as face verification [15,2,25], identification [20], and retrieval. Predicting face attributes from images in the wild is challenging, because of complex face variations such as poses, lightings, and occlusions as shown in Fig.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Context recently has caught attention in a lot of vision based face analysis problems [11], [27], [18], [19]. In an interesting work, Gallahger et al use the neighborhood information in group photographs as a prior for inference of age and gender.…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In their experiments, they found that age and gender inference can gain using the context computed based on the neighbors of a subject. [18], use the neighbor subject's information for inference of identity of a subject. [5].…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In face recognition [15], social context is employed to model the relationship between people, e.g. between friends on Facebook, using a Conditional Random Field (CRF) [16].…”
Section: Top-down Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%