2018
DOI: 10.1002/symb.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Faces of Self and Emotion in Symbolic Interactionism: From Process to Structure and Culture—And Back

Abstract: During the heyday of modernist sociology, two theories emerged within symbolic interaction, each attempting to refine and extend aspects of Mead's framework: Affect Control Theory and Identity Theory. The similarities between these two different theories have led to confusion as well as speculation about their continuance as separate theories. We trace the development of both, contrast their foci and contributions, and outline paradigmatic changes that may reconcile some differences. In addition, we highlight … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How is the internal conversation involved in the selection of identities and in choosing lines of action that verify identities? This avenue of research would be consistent with Francis and Adams' () recent call for processual interactionist researchers to use and refine structural interactionist theories (cf. McLuhan ).…”
Section: Bringing the Internal Conversation Back Insupporting
confidence: 76%
“…How is the internal conversation involved in the selection of identities and in choosing lines of action that verify identities? This avenue of research would be consistent with Francis and Adams' () recent call for processual interactionist researchers to use and refine structural interactionist theories (cf. McLuhan ).…”
Section: Bringing the Internal Conversation Back Insupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We argue that this reveals a deficit of the purely cognitive model in sociology and the need to account for the affective dimension of self. In remedy, we turned to affect control theory (ACT) and its extension, ACT-Self, which are symbolic interactionist theories addressing the role of affect in identity and interaction (Heise 2007; MacKinnon and Heise 2010; MacKinnon 2015) developed in response to the cognitive bias of sociological social psychology (Francis and Adams 2019).…”
Section: Late-life Dementia and The Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative research allows research to 'get at' the inner happenings of participants to describe the experiences of the participants (Corbin & Strauss, 2008;Creswell, 2014), so this suited my study's aim to focus on the meanings constructed by the Grade 10 student participants. The theoretical framework of symbolic interactionism was used to inform the study because teacher expectations are communicated through the symbolic exchanges between teachers and students during classroom interactions (Blumer, 1969;Francis & Adams, 2019). The study sought to develop new theory about how students experience their teachers' expectations of them, so a framework that acknowledges the importance of social interaction in creating mutually constructed realities was appropriate (Blumer, 1969;Powell, 2014).…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%