Two Factor Authentication Berbasis SMS pada Layanan Single Sign-On Universitas Mataram

Mardiansyah, Ahmad Zafrullah; Zubaidi, Ariyan; W, I Gde Putu Wirarama Wedaswhara; Jatmika, Andy Hidayat

doi:10.29303/jcosine.v5i2.424

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The non-technical phase related to user experiences (UX). In this platform, level of user satisfaction while using the application can be measured using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) [21][22][23]. UEQ can also measure level of efficiency, effectiveness, and user satisfaction in general for specific application.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

User Experience Analysis for the Use of Electronic Signature in the Academic Activities

Mardiansyah¹,

Husodo²,

Muvianto³

et al. 2022

Proceedings of the First Mandalika International Multi-Conference on Science and Engineering 2022, MIMSE 2022 (Informatics and

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the Covid-19 pandemic that has spread all around the world, the government has announced policies for conducting physical distancing among people and doing work from home (WFH), including in the academic field. Although in WFH there are still tasks that can be done, some activities are still challenging in WFH. One of which is signing a document. In WFH, signing a document tends to be facilitated by using an electronic signature. By using an electronic signature, the people who sign a document do not have to meet directly in one location. They can sign a document through a dedicated system. This kind of process will make the business process becomes easier. Although many papers have discussed the technical aspects behind any electronic signature, there is rarely a comprehensive analysis related to the user experience analysis of the electronic signature from the user perspective. This paper comprehensively analyzes the user experience of electronic signature usage in academic activities. Here, we use the University of Mataram as our research location. According to our research, we conclude that the scores for pragmatic and hedonic qualities are 1.66 (good) and 1.74 (excellent) respectively, so that the final conclusion of the test is 1.7 (excellent).

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%