2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-01033-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two frugal options to assess class fragility and seismic safety for low-rise reinforced concrete school buildings in Southern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation implies that most of the damaged Italian school buildings can be classified as low-rise buildings (this evidence is also reported in several scientific works, e.g. [25,27]). No particular evidence can be extracted from the inter-storey height parameter: about 85% of the RC school buildings presents values that range from 2.50 m and 3.50 m, while the remaining 15% presents higher values.…”
Section: School Buildings Damaged By Italian Earthquakes: Statistical Analysis On the Specific-class Parameterssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation implies that most of the damaged Italian school buildings can be classified as low-rise buildings (this evidence is also reported in several scientific works, e.g. [25,27]). No particular evidence can be extracted from the inter-storey height parameter: about 85% of the RC school buildings presents values that range from 2.50 m and 3.50 m, while the remaining 15% presents higher values.…”
Section: School Buildings Damaged By Italian Earthquakes: Statistical Analysis On the Specific-class Parameterssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Specific studies dealing with the seismic vulnerability assessment of relevant building typologies, such as schools [15][16][17], hospitals [18] and ecclesiastic heritage [19][20][21][22] are also available. Among the most common approaches adopted to assess and mitigate seismic risk, it is worthwhile mentioning also mechanical-based approaches [23][24][25], rapid visual screening (RVS) methodologies [26][27] and hybrid methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for the analysis results to be realistic, member resistance skeleton curves must necessarily reflect the brittle modes of failure that typically prevail in poorly reinforced members, a feature that leads to an unstable solution and lack of convergence with most Newton-Raphson type schemes used to perform nonlinear structural analysis. This also affects the post-processing of the numerical analysis results [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the similarities between seismic and blast loadings, the global response of buildings subjected to blast loading is not usually critical. In the other words, for a structure that is affected by an explosion, only its critical members (i.e., closer to detonation) are individually assessed and designed by means of different methods (SDOF and FE models) and damage criteria (support rotation and damage index), while for building structures under the effects of earthquake loadings, the global deformations (inter-story drifts) must be evaluated based on the desired performance level (life safety) as the most important response parameter [71,72]. In the design of structures under seismic and blast loading, the desirable features of design-that is, the provision for ductility in member response and increasing the ability to redistribute extreme loads to lesser-loaded elements-must be satisfied.…”
Section: Damage Evaluation Assessment Based On Damage Index Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%