1978
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4825(78)90030-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two graph searching techniques for boundary finding in white blood cell images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enhance the latter, only appropriate connected edges have to be selected from the edge map produced by the detector. This can be done, for instance, by assigning weights to each detected candidate edge and using graph search techniques [77,78] or dynamic programming [79] to find optimal connected edges minimizing a certain cost function.…”
Section: Sobel Edge Detector Initial Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the latter, only appropriate connected edges have to be selected from the edge map produced by the detector. This can be done, for instance, by assigning weights to each detected candidate edge and using graph search techniques [77,78] or dynamic programming [79] to find optimal connected edges minimizing a certain cost function.…”
Section: Sobel Edge Detector Initial Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This edge quality function may, for example, be defined to be the average of the gradient magnitudes of the points, minus some measure of their average disagreement in orientation angles [35,36]. This edge quality function may, for example, be defined to be the average of the gradient magnitudes of the points, minus some measure of their average disagreement in orientation angles [35,36].…”
Section: T H E R O B E R T S E D G E D E T E C T O Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the next node in the OPEN list can be made with a depth-first strategy or using a rating function [3], [10], [11]. Lester and d suggest to take the maximum cost arc of the path as the value of g. The advantage is that g does not build up continuously with depth, so that good paths can be followed for a long time [5]. Since the value of g necessary increases with depth if the costs are positive, Ashkar and Modestino proposed a cost function that takes negative values if the edge has a good evaluation [11. However, if some interesting ideas have been proposed, it seems that it is not possible to keep looking for the path with minimum cost and at the same time to have a depth first strategy, avoiding small undesirable paths.…”
Section: Choice Of Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%