Two‐hour indirect calorimetry measurement as a predictor of 24‐hour energy expenditure in critically ill surgical patients: A longitudinal study

Abstract

BackgroundMeasuring energy expenditure (EE) by indirect calorimetry (IC) has become the gold standard tool for critically ill patients to define energy targets and tailor nutrition. Debate remains as to the optimal duration of measurements or the optimal time of day in which to perform IC.MethodsIn this retrospective longitudinal study, we analyzed results of daily continuous IC in 270 mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center and compared measurements performed at different hours of the day.ResultsA total of 51,448 IC hours was recorded, with an average 24‐h EE of 1523 ± 443 kcal/day. Night shift (00:00–8:00) was found to have significantly lower EE measurements (mean, 1499 ± 439 kcal/day) than afternoon (16:00–00:00; mean, 1526 ± 435 kcal/day) and morning (8:00–16:00; mean, 1539 ± 462 kcal/day) measurements (P < 0.001 for all). The bi‐hourly time frame that most closely resembled the daily mean was 18:00–19:59, with a mean of 1521 ± 433 kcal/day. Daily EE measurements of the continuous IC at days 3–7 of admission showed a trend toward a daily increase in 24‐h EE, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.081).ConclusionsPeriodic measurements of EE can differ slightly when performed at various hours of the day, but the error range is small and may not necessarily have a clinical impact. When continuous IC is not available, a 2‐h EE measurement between 18:00 and 19:59 can serve as a reasonable alternative.