2011
DOI: 10.1090/s0065-9266-2010-00631-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two kinds of derived categories, Koszul duality, and comodule-contramodule correspondence

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
384
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(395 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
384
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All dg algebras and modules will be cohomologically graded (so the differential will have degree 1). Recall (cf., for example [7,Theorem 8.1a]) that the category of A-modules has the structure of a closed model category where weak equivalences are quasi-isomorphisms and fibrations are the surjective maps. All A-modules are fibrant and cofibrant objects are retracts of cell Amodules; the latter are the A-modules having a filtration whose associated factors are free A-modules.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All dg algebras and modules will be cohomologically graded (so the differential will have degree 1). Recall (cf., for example [7,Theorem 8.1a]) that the category of A-modules has the structure of a closed model category where weak equivalences are quasi-isomorphisms and fibrations are the surjective maps. All A-modules are fibrant and cofibrant objects are retracts of cell Amodules; the latter are the A-modules having a filtration whose associated factors are free A-modules.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the structure of a closed model category in which the weak equivalences are strictly stronger than quasi-isomorphisms and fibrations are surjections [7,Theorem 8.2a]. All E-modules are fibrant and the cofibrant E-modules are the retracts of free E-modules (disregarding the differential).…”
Section: Formulation Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The assertions of the above theorems can be modified so as to hold for arbitrary augmented DG-algebras and conilpotent DG-coalgebras. One just has to replace the class of quasi-isomorphisms of DG-coalgebras with a finer class of filtered quasi-isomorphisms of conilpotent DG-coalgebras, which are to be inverted in order to obtain a category equivalent to the category of augmented DG-algebras with quasi-isomorphisms inverted (see [15,Section 4] or [36,Section 6.10]). In the form stated above, on the other hand, the assertions of the theorems do not hold already for the negatively cohomologically graded DG-coalgebras that are not simply connected-in fact, this is the class of DG-coalgebras for which the difference between quasi-isomorphisms and filtered quasi-isomorphisms becomes essential.…”
Section: Proof Part (A): Define An Increasing Filtration On a Dg-algmentioning
confidence: 99%