2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Legs are Better than Three: New Zealand as a Model for Old Age Pensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1930s, New Zealand emerged as a leading welfare state and it is not clear if it has entirely reverted to a residual welfare state afterward (Castles, 2010: 633–34). More importantly, the country’s score for universalism reflects a particularly low level of private social expenditures, which is probably tied to a universal, flat-rate and generous public pension system that brings the country closer to Denmark than to other English-speaking nations (Scruggs and Allan, 2006: 62; St John and Willmore, 2001). The other cases are largely located where one would expect.…”
Section: Concepts Measurement and Evidence: What Is Targeting Withinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1930s, New Zealand emerged as a leading welfare state and it is not clear if it has entirely reverted to a residual welfare state afterward (Castles, 2010: 633–34). More importantly, the country’s score for universalism reflects a particularly low level of private social expenditures, which is probably tied to a universal, flat-rate and generous public pension system that brings the country closer to Denmark than to other English-speaking nations (Scruggs and Allan, 2006: 62; St John and Willmore, 2001). The other cases are largely located where one would expect.…”
Section: Concepts Measurement and Evidence: What Is Targeting Withinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For European countries, we cross check our data set with the NBER series on social security programs and retirement around the world, including Fraikin, Jousten, and Lefebvre (2018) for Belgium, Bingley, Gupta, Jorgensen, and Pedersen (2014) for Denmark, Lassila and Valkonen (2002) for Finland, Blanchet, Bozio, Rabate, and Roger (2019) for France, Franco (2002) and Brugiavini and Peracchi (2014) for Italy, Vegas Sánchez, Argimón, Botella, and González (2013) and Garcia-Gomez, Garcia-Mandico, Jimenez-Martin, and Castello (2018) for Spain, and Blake (2002) and Banks and Emmerson (2018) for the United Kingdom. For non-European countries, we use Nielson (2010) and Herscovitch and Stanton (2008) for Australia, and John and Willmore (2001) for New Zealand as reference. Also, we cross check our data set with Beetsma, Klaassen, Romp, and van Maurik (2020), in which the authors compile pension reform measures using the NATLEX database of the International Labor Organization, the International Social Security Association database, the European Commission's Labour Market Reform database, and other sources.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the New International Version has it: 'speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves'. 1 Willmore (2001) reports that only 4 countries have universal non-means-tested schemes: New Zealand, Mauritius, Botswana and Namibia. Hancock et al (2005) say that 18 out of 30 OECD countries include a means tested component in their state systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%