2008
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.45.668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Level Coarse Mesh Finite Difference Formulation with Multigroup Source Expansion Nodal Kernels

Abstract: As an effort to establish a fast, yet accurate multigroup nodal solution method that is crucial in repeated static and transient calculations for advanced reactors, the source expansion form of the semi-analytic nodal method (SANM) is introduced within the framework of the coarse mesh finite difference (CMFD) formulation. The source expansion is to expand the analytic form of the source appearing in the groupwise neutron diffusion equation with a set of orthogonal polynomials in order to obtain a group decoupl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6.15b), use a quartic Legendre expansion. However, the flux also has two additional hyperbolic terms [151]:…”
Section: Source Expansion Nodal Methods (Senm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6.15b), use a quartic Legendre expansion. However, the flux also has two additional hyperbolic terms [151]:…”
Section: Source Expansion Nodal Methods (Senm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following section, a backward differentiation formula is derived for the variable time step case and a generic adaptive time step control method based on the BDF method is presented. The BDF method is applied in Section 3 to three-dimensional kinetics calculation employing the coarse mesh finite difference (CMFD) formulation with the source expansion nodal method (SENM) kernels 10 and a practical adaptive time control scheme for the BDF-based spatial kinetics calculation is introduced. The performances of the BDF spatial kinetics calculation and the adaptive time step control scheme are assessed in Section 4 through the analyses of the NEACRP control rod ejection 11 and withdrawal 12 benchmark problems.…”
Section: Abstract : Bdf Adaptive Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the local kernel, there are two CMFD methods: one-node (1-N) CMFD and two-node (2-N) CMFD. The advantage of 1-N CMFD is a simpler implementation and the possibility of the direct 2-G CMFD formulation for multi-group (MG) problems, and the disadvantage is the fact that additional spatial sweeps are needed to make the convergence behavior more stable [1][2][3][4]. The advantage of 2-N CMFD is a stable convergence, and the disadvantage is the difficulty in applying the method to hexagonal lattice and the lack of applicability to direct 2-G CMFD for MG problems [1,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%